KUCHING: Promoting a multiracial Malaysia is constitutional and upholds the right to equality, contrary to former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's claims, says Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS).
especially dobbs. basically we re seeing a court world back the protections that make it possible, indeed facilitate the process of a multiracial, multi ethnic democracy. education, reproductive rights, financial security, all of these things that we need in order to be in a democracy that is inclusive and includes everyone. and that seems to be the thing the court is railing against. and to be very clear we had a bar burner of a term last year. and particularly the rhythms of the supreme court are such that won? what we had a big, when you take a breather. but we had this year. it looks like a ship being off to have a barber and a return next year and one of the questions the american people have to ask is, how many bonds are there left to burn or is this court just intent on bringing it all down? to your point, this is marked the roberts court. so i guess my question to you is the legacy of the roberts court now going to be about undoing the progress that has been made thro
melissa, i ll start with. you just kind of the big picture takeaway of what we saw unfold today. people on the surface may think of these cases being very different on the issues that they tackle even though they are hypothetical as we said, with chris there. but there is a connective tissue between all of them, as i was sort of outlined there. do you see that as well, that there is a common theme between all of these cases? a common th i think is a come before tween the cases beside the storm and last term especially dobbs. basically we re seeing a court world back the protections that make it possible, indeed facilitate the process of a multiracial, multi ethnic democracy. education, reproductive rights, financial security, all of these things that we need in order to be in a democracy that is inclusive and includes everyone. and that seems to be the thing the court is railing against. and to be very clear we had a bar burner of a term last year. and particularly the rhythms of the
sensible, restrained tool to help our society achieve its goal of equal opportunity and integration. as affirmative action still as necessary to now as you saw it to be back then? ~ ., ., ~ ~ then? well, look, i think we have a multiracial, - have a multiracial, multi ethnic democracy. we know that talent exists in every community in america and we ought to wish to have our institutions and our opportunities as widely available to every member went to all of that talent in every community. in america. that s all affirmative action has been about. how you reach out and seek and encourage that talent to participate in schools and universities, to participate in job opportunities, participate in leadership opportunities. 0k. 4 in leadership opportunities. 0k. ~ ., . , 0k. and i think that enriches everybody 0k. and i think that enriches everybody and 0k. and i think that enriches everybody and i ok. and i think that enriches everybody and i think- 0k. and i think that enriches e
divided by race? the elite say yes. but a good majority of americans and six supreme court justices on the court say no. politicians who defend the racial spoil system that has royaled so much of american society, they do so because they want to keep the people scared and divided. after decades of democrats in charge and their fake appeals for racial healing, what s happened to urban america? its worse, it s worse off, not better off. healing, real healing, comes when all americans are treated equally without regard to race. the left fears what we re building. a multiracial, multiethnic coalition that believes in helping american workers and upholding our constitution. and that s the ingraham angle. joining me is one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against harvard. president and general counsel of the center for equal