districts to justify why they re not proceeding, particularly when you have jerry nadler who is not some wild out radical saying the things that he is saying and gradually moving there, so it s going to be uncomfortable for a lot of people that are in the congress. so gabe, i want to ask you this: you know, the democrats, a lot of talk, here at the end of mueller week, a lot of democrats said before mule e we ve read the book mueller, we ve read the book, now we have to see the movie. mueller did not want to play a starring role. he gave damming confirmation, reaffirmation on the things in his report, on the substance, merits, but it was not the movie, it was not the independence day. it was not, you know, any of these. a big block buster that changed everything. now democrats try to figure out what do we do with what we got, and i want to put a tweet up
heather: so why is the media allowing democrats to go unchecked on the collusion claims, here now to debate conservative radio talk show host summer and political analyst kelly, thank you for joining us this morning, appreciate it. good morning, thanks for having me. shantel, i will start with you, you heard what adam schiff had to say, he s arguing that people don t want to see the collusion but is he going too far the other way where he sees nothing but collusion no matter what these reports seem to say? of course, he s going too far the other way, there s no evidence of collusion, if there was evidence of collusion the senate committee would have found it, the house committee would have found it and investigator mule e has done thorough job but there s been no indictment with the collision, this is a witch hunt and should come to conclusion soon so we don t continue to waste more money on the process. heather: kelly in reference to the senate intelligence committee and their r
involved in the investigation, the management, the d.o.j., now with it on the table as a point of inquiry, they probably need their own rights, too. no matter what mule e muelle reports, this will be a question for the republican lead congress. by practice and supreme court ruling, president s are not indictable in office. that is true for the peopling surrounding the president. i think that we re out of time, but it can hit the president or his after it. thank you very much. speaking to the father of a son that was released recently by north korea. you re watching andrea mitchell