wonderful and he s the greatest. but what if there was one political party who was, like, what is poison really? does killing one in every ten, was it the poison? maybe people are allergic to muffins. that s what one political party is doing right now because they need poisonous muffins. that s part of the deal. jake, you can respond to the poisonous muffins. ben is absolutely right. we have tremendous respect for one another, but i think it s true that that is absolutely right, but as you guys are also pointing out, we don t have data transparency and data laws in this country. right. until we get serious about letting independent academics get inside these places and look at them as hard as ben and others have done, it will be difficult to refute a claim like that. we re handicapping ourselves in that case. we ve all learned a huge amount from the social media era. i hope regulators have and i hope they don t fall for the idea that this is too complicated to understand, we
and he was saying i don t get it. if i make 10,000 muffins and one person gets food poisoning, am i supposed to stop making muffins? there was a long, awkward pause, and i said, yeah, that s exactly what you re supposed to be doing, we pull muffins off the shelf when that happens. are we going to regulate this the way we regular late food or guns? the idea we re not going to do it here doesn t make sense to me. speech is regulated. there s been a high-profile defamation case, din i don t know and fox news. it seems like transparency is really the answer here, and that s what they re focused on in europe, too, and that has been a real problem. sam altman has been less than excited about transparency, and i think that would solve some of your problems. i want to say, jake is right and i love him and he s
a fondness for it, although it caused me so much trouble inside, i m glad it s in myjaw and i have a new one! i i m glad it s in my “aw and i have a new one! ., ~ , ., i m glad it s in my “aw andihavea new one! ., ~ , ., ., i m glad it s in my “awandlhavea newone! ., ~ , ., ., , new one! i would keep that on my mantelpiece- new one! i would keep that on my mantelpiece. new one! i would keep that on my mantelpiece. i m new one! i would keep that on my mantelpiece. i m glad - new one! i would keep that on my mantelpiece. i m glad it s - new one! i would keep that on my mantelpiece. i m glad it s in i mantelpiece. i m glad it s in that “an mantelpiece. i m glad it s in that jar- she mantelpiece. i m glad it s in that jar. she said mantelpiece. i m glad it s in that jar. she said it mantelpiece. i m glad it s in that jar. she said it was - mantelpiece. i m glad it s in that jar. she said it was like i mantelpiece. i m glad it s in that jar. she s