their top foreign security position. they got to exert influence over who was considered by the trump administration to be ambassador to the united arab emirates. they literally got to script language from this adviser to the new president that he used in all of his media interviews around the campaign, praising emirates and its leaders in bootlicking terms, they wrote the language for him to use in those interviews. from him, according to prosecutors, they got inside our help turning the united states in the uterine, one 80, against a country that s their rival cutter. they turned us against qatar even though the u.s. has a long-standing relationship with qatar and a gigantic u.s. military base there, prosecutors allege that tom barrack, as an inside meant for this country got the trump administration and the u.s. government to do that. they got language they wanted from trump in that big energy speech that he did on the campaign, the one for which tom barrack sent his notes on the
robert mueller s team to refer tom barrack for potential prosecution, specifically to refer him to the justice department, to prosecutors in the eastern district of new york for potential criminal prosecution as a foreign agent. new york times was first to report that in the summer of 2019. well, now almost exactly two years later it is, in fact, that u.s. attorney s office in the eastern district of new york that has, in fact, brought a prosecution today against, in fact, tom barrack for, in fact, allegedly being a secret foreign agent. i don t know why it took two years for mueller s criminal referral of tom barrack as a potential foreign agent to produce an unsealed indictment to that end, but two years almost to the day since that was first reported here it is. in the indictment unsealed today, prosecutors allege that the people tom barrack showed that draft speech to during the trump campaign might have been redacted in his fbi notes from the mueller investigation, but in the in
one but two u.s. attorney offices have opened investigations into suspicious spending in the trump inaugural, although, as of yet, we haven t seen those investigations bear fruit in the form of public facing indictments. the attorney general in washington d.c. is now pursuing a case against the trump inaugural committee, it alleges that it was used as a piggy bank to dump money into trump s private business. and that suit in washington d.c. continues. meanwhile, the vice chair of the trump inaugural, a man named elliott broidy, pleaded guilty of working as a secret agent. he pardoned him. trump pardons his with tom barrack is charged with being a foreign agent while he was working on the trump campaign and for the trump transition and from the trump inaugural, and once trump was in office. and if this kind of crime
tonight into. but today we came we learn from today s indictment from the donald trump s inaugural chairman, we learned that tom barrack was allergic lee working with the uae at that time both trump come pain and u.s. policy. according to the indictment, barack flew to morocco in 2016 to present this major proposal to his friends in the uae and the new strategic alignment between that country in the united states. that date ends up being the important in retrospective, on august 3rd, 2016. where representative from the united arab emirates was trying to get trump a elected what was going on there? between the trump campaign and his advisers and the and united
prosecution. specifically to refer him to the justice department, in the eastern district of new york for potential criminal prosecution as a foreign agent. new york times was the first to report that in the summer of 2019. well now, almost exactly two years later, it is in fact that u.s. attorney s office in the eastern district of new york that has in fact brought a prosecution today against, in fact, tom barrack for, in fact, being a secret foreign agent. i don t know why he took two years for mueller s criminal referral of tom barrack as a potential foreign agent, to steal a new indictment to that end, but almost two years since it has been reported, here it is. and in the indictment, until today, prosecutors allege that the people tom barrack show that draft speech to might have been redacted in his fbi notes from the mueller investigation. but in the indictment, they spell it out. they say the people who he showed the draft speech to were