is there any legal action? is there any need to change the laws of the nation? and oversight is one of the responsible use of congress, so while we are not looking at the mueller issues, mr. nadler is looking at all of the other things and the list is very, very long. we want to have to say come out views of this program know you because you come on. i get lots of feedback on how they listen to you. when i hear things like what i m about to play, i have to ask you what is this helpful? so this is adam schiff. kevin mccarthy, slamming adam schiff as modern-day joe mccarthy. watch this. before this investigation even began, he said he had proof and evidence. i m not related to joe mccarthy, but adam schiff is a modern-day joe mccarthy. somebody who claims something and never has delivered. but the one thing he has delivered on protecting fusion gps. he didn t want us to know that the democrats paid for the
so that leads me to my next question. so we expect that there will be this one report that mueller issues, but there could be additional charges that may be come from different u.s. attorneys offices. and what you re suggesting, what happened during the watergate area, they could potential offer up evidence to allow congress to take action in some way, shape, or form. that s true. and in addition, mr. mueller could return from the grand juries he s working with, still other indictments. he has returned indictments that are in our trade known as speaking indictments. they are very detailed and have been up to this point. that there may, yet, be more to come, in connection with other subjects. so stay tuned. this could be quite an interesting next couple of weeks. so if you re someone that is somewhat of a casual observer,
as well, lying under oath is an impeachable offense according to kavanaugh. so if the president gets interviewed and lies, then you have a justice who if he gets confirmed has said that s an abuse of office and impeachable defense. offense. the thing that i think that really needs to be fleshed out through the hearing process is whether kavanaugh should be required to recuse himself from any matter that becomes a part of the litigation that mueller brings. that is whether a president can be indicted, if that comes to pass, and/or perhaps more importantly whether or not the subpoena that mueller issues for testimony, if that is the case, is something that he should recuse himself from because it looks like the potential of an appearance of conflict. what is the likelihood of that happening, do you think? i don t know. i don t know. it depends on kavanaugh s own sort of sense of judicial propriety.
starr and wrote the report that led to the impeachment of president clinton, he said lying to the american public is an impeachable offense. that s clearly at play in the mueller investigation. as well, lying under oath is an impeachable offense according to kavanaugh. so if the president gets interviewed and lies, then you have a justice who if he gets confirmed has said that s an abuse of office and impeachable defense. the thing that i think that really needs to be fleshed out through the hearing process is whether kavanaugh should be required to recuse himself from any matter that becomes a part of the litigation that mueller brings. that is whether a president can be indicted, if that comes to pass, and/or perhaps more importantly whether or not the subpoena that mueller issues for testimony, if that is the case, is something that he should recuse himself from because it