two words. as a former federal prosecutor, they are meaningless to me because one witness can take you from being a subject to a target. and unless and until you have interviewed everyone, and looked at everything, no one has been implicated and no one has been exculpated. you have nothing to hide. sit down, assuming a fair prosecutor, a fair prosecutor and i think mueller is, sit down and tell him what you know. harris: harvard law professor emeritus alan dershowitz is urging the president to be cautious. watch. i would say it s good news for the president, but i would say that he has to be very cautious. because targets sometimes evolve from subjects, particularly if they testify and they testify in a way that the prosecution thinks is false. harris: it s so interesting the way that mr. dershowitz can see things from both sides. right? we don t need to see mr. dershowitz from that
from you asked me almost eight or nine months ago if i thought there was obstruction. i thought there was. now i know there is. but i also am equally convinced that there is collusion. yeah, the commercial airs every four minutes still. hey, jill, is it the point in the investigation where mueller is switches to asking only those questions he already knows the answers to? is this fact-finding or is this case-building and corroboration now? i would say he s building the case. and he s getting ready for either indictments or a report to congress for impeachment. or some other form of action against additional people. and from what we know, he s really into the details. and when he asks questions, people are surprised by how much he knows and the detail he knows. where people were sitting in a meeting. not just that they were at a meeting. and i think that this is all part of how you really build a
maybe she planned it. i said today, dianne feinstein is sticking around at 85 and she s leaving at 29 because he wants to spend more time with her family? i m going to pursue other ambitions when you get fired that s what you say. why is she leaving? this crew, mueller is let s go after sessions. he s still blaming jeff sessions for allowing robert mueller to come at him. that s right. nine months after special counsel robert mueller was appointed, president trump is still upset with his most loyal ally jeff sessions another attack this morning on sessions. disgraceful. the difference is jeff sessions fought back for the first time. he said as long as he s the attorney general, he s going to discharge his duties with honor and integrity. the justice department is going to follow the constitution, not the orders of president trump. he wants his justice department leader to be roy cohn. he wants to be a dirty trickster for him is what he wants.
but it is the president himself who s involved in this. and i think the evidence is really getting much clearer that there is definitely not just an obstruction, which i ve said from you asked me almost eight or nine months ago if i thought there was obstruction. i thought there was. now i know there is. but i also am equally convinced that there is collusion. yeah, the commercial airs every four minutes still. hey, jill, is it the point in the investigation where mueller is switches to asking only those questions he already knows the answers to? is this fact-finding or is this case-building and corroboration now? i would say he s building the case. and he s getting ready for either indictments or a report to congress for impeachment. or some other form of action against additional people. and from what we know, he s really into the details. and when he asks questions, people are surprised by how much he knows and the detail he
your way up to the top. the bottom here is quite high if we look at the people who have been charged. people like michael flynn, paul kbl manafort, the president s former campaign manager. gates, again, he stayed on the campaign even after paul manafort got fired. he knows something about the operation. he can answer questions like when there were all these trump campaign operatives running around meeti with russians. when russians were engaged in this effort to hack the election, could people high up in the trump campaign not have known about that? again, gates is important because he s got the goods. while manafort, at the end of the day, i don t think that s most important. the charges against manafort are easy to prove. basically paper crimes that mueller has the evidence on. so i think he is especially interested, mueller is, on what gates knows about trump. so so this is more about what gates knows about trump than getting malmanafort to flip.