response to a subpoena from congress, in this case don mcgahn who as you know was the former white house counsel and an important witness in the obstruction of justice part of the investigation. and the house is arguing it needs mueller grand jury secrets to show in the senate impeachment trial president trump s pattern of soliciting interference and obstruction. right, exactly. that is the one reference they make in the articles of impeachment that have been approved but the question is what does this matter for think other parts of what the house democrats are doing. and i think what the courts are struggling with, and certainly what the administration is trying to exploit here, is the fact that the democrats have already voted for these articles of impeachment and the answer is from the house democrats is we could always impeach him again essentially. we could ardmore articles of impeachment in addition to the ones already approved. be interesting to see how that would work.
an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome. .have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing. . or allergic reactions to your doctor right away in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes. .fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect. is bone and muscle ache. ask your doctor. .about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card. we re following new moves by the justice department fighting to prevent house democrats from obtaining secrets from the mueller grand jury and testimony by former white house counsel don mcgahn. i want to bring in cnn senior
favor. emily did you find these professors especially pompous? or did you see them actual experts? i saw them as pompous. he brought me back to law school and i felt so embarrassed for everyone, for all of us had to sit do that. and for people who are used to regular court proceedings, this was totally recognizable. they were academics who were pronouncing guilt and with their guilt showing through. and now obstruction is resisting some oddly undefined process and were supposed to just swallow without questioning. as a defendant is supposed to questioning it. so the whole thing is clearly off. and if the democrats really cleared about abuse of power in securing evidence and analyzing it. it was there would not be a rush they would be waiting for the january court series and the mueller grand jury to come out, and they ll be taking their time because this is a big deal. but instead they remedied our threats.
professors especially pompous? or did you see them actual experts? i saw them as pompous. he brought me back to law school and i felt so embarrassed for everyone, for all of us had to sit do that. and for people who are used to regular court proceedings, this was totally recognizable. they were academics who were pronouncing guilt and with their guilt showing through. and now obstruction is resisting some oddly undefined process and were supposed to just swallow without questioning. as a defendant is supposed to questioning it. so the whole thing is clearly off. and if the democrats really cleared about abuse of power in securing evidence and analyzing it. it was there would not be a rush they would be waiting for the january court series and the mueller grand jury to come out, and they ll be taking their time because this is a big deal. but instead they remedied our threats. garbage, it s a garbage theme cat that s what it is garbage.
favor. emily did you find these professors especially pompous? or did you see them actual experts? i saw them as pompous. he brought me back to law school and i felt so embarrassed for everyone, for all of us had to sit do that. and for people who are used to regular court proceedings, this was totally recognizable. they were academics who were pronouncing guilt and with their guilt showing through. and now obstruction is resisting some oddly undefined process and were supposed to just swallow without questioning. as a defendant is supposed to questioning it. so the whole thing is clearly off. and if the democrats really cleared about abuse of power in securing evidence and analyzing it. it was there would not be a rush they would be waiting for the january court series and the mueller grand jury to come out, and they ll be taking their time because this is a big deal. but instead they remedied our threats. garbage, it s a garbage theme