i agree that a woman with a mud streaked face is a much better way to go. i just don t understand. it could be a pretty woman with a mud streaked face or an average looking woman or ugly woman. i don t think it makes a difference. if the goal is to show that women can handle combat, using a made up soldier is counterproductive to that. what about the ones with the men? they didn t have this discussion until women were forced into combat roles in the military. if you see pictures the guy is not a perfectly creased uniform with his hair done. he has caw ma flog and mud on his face and it should be the same for women. the physical requirements should be the same. i can post them to our website. that s the issue if the standards are different. they are massively different. in combat roles? yes.
i agree that a woman with a mud streaked face is a much better way to go. i just don t understand. it could be a pretty woman with a mud streaked face or an average looking woman or ugly woman. i don t think it makes a difference. if the goal is to show that women can handle combat, using a made up soldier is counterproductive to that. what about the ones with the men? they didn t have this discussion until women were forced into combat roles in the military. if you see pictures the guy is not a perfectly creased uniform with his hair done. he has caw ma flog and mud on his face and it should be the same for women. the physical requirements should be the same. i can post them to our website. that s the issue if the standards are different. they are massively different. in combat roles? yes. are you sure?