a judicial review in several places, really. they said on the legal basis of the mayor because my power to act, the legality of the public consultation, the mayor s decision to provide a scrappage scheme which did not always include areas outside of london, epic contention for those driving into london every day, they felt they were not really consulted but mrjustice said he was satisfied and that is the decision today. thank you, frances read at the high court in london, just finishing off the score for the women s world cup game, england versus denmark, 1 0. july 2023 is certainly shaping up to be fairly white, with well above average rainfall across all parts of the uk. average rainfall across all parts of the uk. shaping up to be fairly wet. lots of dry weather with
elton john, days. that isn t the case today. no eltonjohn, no prince harry so far, but proceedings have been going on for 25 minutes on court 76 in the building behind me. this is not yet a trial. this is an argument, a legal argument, a trial. this is an argument, a legalargument, between a trial. this is an argument, a legal argument, between lawyers representing the people who publish the daily mail and the claimants, including prince harry, doreen lawrence and five other people, about whether there is evidence about whether there is evidence about whether there is evidence about whether also the law allows for there to be a subsequent trial. this is legal argument that has been going on forfour days now in this is legal argument that has been going on for four days now in front of thejudge, mrjustice nick lane. at the very heart of this is allegations by that core group of seven people, based on evidence they say has only relatively recently come to light, allegations they say abou
an tustin described in court as a manipulative liar, was given a life sentence with a minimum term of 29 years for murder. arthur s father, thomas hughes, branded pitiless, got 21 years for manslaughter. thejudge, mrjustice michael walker, said it had been: but the solihull mp on social media said the sentences were too lenient. there is a palpable sense of real loss and tragedy over this, and also, frankly, a sense of anger, and questions as to how this was allowed to happen, how these monsters were allowed to inflict this horrible torture on this young, defenceless boy. a spokesperson for the attorney general s office said:
to be caring for him. emma tustin, described in court as a manipulative liar, was given a life sentence with a minimum term of 29 years for murder. arthur s father, thomas hughes, branded pitiless, got 21 years for manslaughter. the judge, mrjustice mark wall, said it had been, without doubt, one of the most distressing and disturbing cases i have had to deal with. i ve just laid flowers at the shrine for young arthur. but the solihull mp on social media said the sentences were too lenient. there s a palpable sense of real loss and tragedy over this and also, frankly, a sense of anger and questions as to how this was allowed to happen, how these monsters were allowed to inflict this horrible torture on this young defenseless boy. a spokesperson for the attorney general s office said, the attorney general s thoughts are with those who loved arthur. i can confirm that the sentences given to emma tustin and thomas hughes have been referred to the attorney general for a review to d