assessment and move from there. so i really regret all of this discussion. which is creating a conflict that need not be there. the administration is redty foreadyfor this. chris: let me bring in congressman king. despite the comments of feinstein do you think dzhokhar tsarnaev should be treated as enemy combatant? i think he should be treated as enemy combatant. there are so many questions unanswered and so many potential links to terrorism here. the battlefield was not in the united states so i believe he s enemy combatant. he would not be tried before military commission. he would be tried in civilian court and the statements taken from him cannot be used against him in the trial. right now, one of the only links we have as the chechen involve in the al-qaeda mov movement. are there other conspirators out there?
assessment and move from there. so i really regret all of this discussion. which is creating a conflict that need not be there. the administration is redty foreadyfor this. chris: let me bring in congressman king. despite the comments of feinstein do you think dzhokhar tsarnaev should be treated as enemy combatant? i think he should be treated as enemy combatant. there are so many questions unanswered and so many potential links to terrorism here. the battlefield was not in the united states so i believe he s enemy combatant. he would not be tried before military commission. he would be tried in civilian court and the statements taken from him cannot be used against him in the trial. right now, one of the only links we have as the chechen involve in the al-qaeda mov movement. are there other conspirators out there?
assessment and move from there. so i really regret all of this discussion. which is creating a conflict that need not be there. the administration is redty foreadyfor this. chris: let me bring in congressman king. despite the comments of feinstein do you think dzhokhar tsarnaev should be treated as enemy combatant? i think he should be treated as enemy combatant. there are so many questions unanswered and so many potential links to terrorism here. the battlefield was not in the united states so i believe he s enemy combatant. he would not be tried before military commission. he would be tried in civilian court and the statements taken from him cannot be used against him in the trial. right now, one of the only links we have as the chechen involve in the al-qaeda mov movement. are there other conspirators out there? where do they get the
a couple of years ago they were in love with him. everything was peachy. he was so good looking and now he is crazy and nuts and don t know what to do. you should have listened to me. i was the sympathetic next door neighbor telling you to break up with occupy wall street. he is bad for you, bad for you. if you only would listen to me. bob: you did this around nato and nato always has protesters before occupy wall street. eric: the history of occupy wall street. a year ago he had a speech in kansas, whatever it was. class warfare. in kansas. he embraced the movement. around that time he said they had been wrong blame people at millionaires and billionaires. he embraced the occupy mov movement. now bomb plot in ohio, he has to push back. but carefully because they re funded by unions. bob: they are not.
a couple of years ago they were in love with him. everything was peachy. he was so good looking and now he is crazy and nuts and don t know what to do. you should have listened to me. i was the sympathetic next door neighbor telling you to break up with occupy wall street. he is bad for you, bad for you. if you only would listen to me. bob: you did this around nato and nato always has protesters before occupy wall street. eric: the history of occupy wall street. a year ago he had a speech in kansas, whatever it was. class warfare. in kansas. he embraced the movement. around that time he said they had been wrong blame people at millionaires and billionaires. he embraced the occupy mov movement. now bomb plot in ohio, he has to push back. but carefully because they re funded by unions. bob: they are not.