horrific decision of the supreme court. in fairness to justice jackson, maybe he was thinking, as i originally thought, about the expression of being binding on lower court judges, trial judges, apellate court judges. to decide what laws should fworch. i think that s probably right, senator. justice jackson is one of our greatest justices. to question anything is whether it s youngstown, morrisette, he wrote the greatest opinions and example of judicial independence as well. on that one line, i take your point. let me ask you one last question. we talked a lot about role of
people being able to respond to horrific decision of the supreme court. well, in fairness to justice jackson, maybe he was thinking as i originally thought about the expression as being binding on lower court judges. yes. trial judges, appellate court judges, and the supreme court does have the final word in that food chain of the judiciary, but not in terms of the fundamental authority of the american people to decide what laws should goffgov govern them. to question anything is, you know, whether it was korematsu or youngstown or morrisette, justice jackson wrote some of the greatest opinions and the example of judicial independence as well. on that one line, i take your point. let me ask you one last question. we have talked a lot about the role of precedent, and senator