problems and we spends hundreds of millions of dollars in central america and two three countries in particular and we don t get back a lot for the money and one of our contributors morgan ortegus thinks we need to spend more idea. a lot of different ways to spend the money. look at private invest meant corporation is doing, sleepily dormant institution within the government that invests in companies and industries and infrastructure in countries that are friendly to the united states but need a boost up and i think morgan s point and one that i absolutely agree with as well, we need to look at dealing the issue at the source of the problem. rob: corruption. you send the money it doesn t get to people. 100%, that s why we need to pay attention to the source of it and not necessarily what s happening on the border.
is watching closely what we do in north korea, they are looking to see if actions match our rhetoric and rebecca is right that general kelly is very experienced and not going to recommend to the president that we sit by and do nothing and try to contain north korea. what does that mean in that means the credible threat of military force and that could get very messy in the region. certainly complicated when you throw china in the mix. neil: rebecca, one of the things about having somebody like that they focus on the real threats and to morgan s point concern about north korea, concern about iran and he raised it with russia as well, i believe that russia meddled in the last election, it didn t attar alter results but did meddle. the one thing to get sense of the general, he will be in
over two years. implying the physical computer was gone. i think what they meant is that after six months they overwrite, and you save six months, then when you hit the seven months you go back and override over the data. again you don t have by the way, we re limited to this time period in which we were questioning these irs miami miamis e-mails, and if you re going crash everything, take everything. morgan s point is critical. if a human being has to actually go back and take this very critical intentional step again, i m the lawyer, not the science guy, but if that s true you ll have a pretty extensive set of very nervous people. you re talking rosemary woods, the tape taped over. goes beyond credulity. so you want to get your hands on