say going forward we need to correct this process and make sure this is fair, honest, reliable and we have to correct this thing going forward. it s interesting to see whether one of the long-term ramifications of the whole remote 2016 campaign is going to be fundamental reforms in how we conduct surveillance warrants. the spotlight has now been put on the secret court in a way that s never happened before. what would be an appropriate fix? what they did was line. when they falsified records and said he was not working for the cia when he was in fact working for the cia, carter page. they look through and cheese saying don t mind it wants. that doesn t seem like that s a rule change, much like a morality change. that there is a few things you could do. one possibility is you could build my safeguards into the process. either additional levels of review within the government so if an agent is preparing a report you would have three or four other people look at it