with college degrees, english speaking skills and job skills that can contribute to their economy. soga they have very few illegal immigrants. tucker: of course. if you cared about your country, of course he would have a system like that, it wouldn t even be a question. professor, thank you, you re welcome on the show anytime. thank you, thank you for inviting me. tucker: of course. thanks. up in canada, justin trudeau, who runs the country, sort of, just lost a trash war with the philippines and is expected to lose the next election too. he s got a plan to save himself. banning plastic straws.st by the way, not just plastic straws, other kinds of plastic. tammy bruce here to assess that campaign strategy after the break. just one free hearing test at
and certainly you can even make the case that if they impeach, that it actually helps the president of thehe united state. i think it s so divisive that we shouldn t do it, but in the end i think that they re going to try to do death by 1,000 cuts and have hearing after hearing after hearing and try to inflict as much as much partisan damage as they possiblyy can. tucker: isn t that kind of a tough case to make to your own voters though?nt for two years they tell us the president is a criminal, a trader, he literally has committed treason on behalf of a hostilet foreign power but no, e are not impeaching him? how does that make sense? it is very difficult when you try to lay out the case but here s the thing they know is coming, you ve been talking about at night in and night out here at the 8:00 hour. you can talk about the fact that there is other information that s coming and i m telling you, attorney general bill barr, john durham, they are on this case and what we will find is
most of my students are against illegal immigration. i respect everyone s viewpoints. i tell students you don t have to believe me. if you want to make a convincing argument, please provide evidence. tucker: do you provide evidence to back up your positions on immigration? absolutely. there have been numerous studies, harvard professors have conducted the most in-depth statistical analysis on the consequences of illegal immigration on the american economy and how that directly lowers the incomes of high school graduates, those with less than a high school diploma in the united states. tucker: so for saying what you just said, backing up an opinion with evidence, in this case by a harvard researcher, some are saying that you should be fired from her job. what does that tell you? festival, i have job security. i m an associate professor. mymy institution has an academic freedom policy.
tucker: we are a long way from seeing the race to choose the democratic nominee, almost a year, but joe biden is acting like it s alreadyng over. biden is preparing himself, he says, for an all-out war with president trump. today we ve seen him carry this, and saint joe biden was ready to eviscerate the president. turned out to be a fitting term. he didn t speak of trump like a politician or even a human being, he described the president as if he were the leader of an enemy country. watch. i believe that the president is literally an excess dental threat to america. so i i think he s genuinely a threat to our core values and he s a threat to our standing to the world. i think there s a genuine threat to american democracy.
think. what we are witnessing is a very public obstruction ofhe justice. he, as i see it, has already exceeded everything that nixon did. you re saying in your opinion donald trump has gone farther than richard nixon did to obstruct justice? that s exactly what i m saying. i think trump is nixon on steroids and stilts. tucker: nixon on steroids! a certain kind of dimwitted baby boomer, this kind of thing is totally irresistible.st reese s peanut butter cup pizza. at the hearing, dean admitted that he didn t have any relevant knowledge of anything that s happened in this century, but he is still 100% positive that donald trump is more evil than richard nixon ever was. the last time i appear before your committee was july 111974. during the impingement inquiry of richard nixon. clearly i m not here today as a fact witness. in many ways, the mueller report