6th attack was a very serious thing. but if the argument is, we re poised to tip into a civil war, you need more than a few hundred people starting a riot outside the capitol. you need large numbers of americans who are prepared to actually enact real political violence. and i think everything that we have seen since january 6th indicates that the vast, vast majority of people who say things like, you know, biden stole the election, they re taking the country from us and so on are not enthusiastic about actual armed conflict in a way that could tip america even into a late 1960s style scenario. let alone the actual term civil war. i also note that what you actually need to get something describable as a civil war are organized forces that are capable of disrupting the federal government s monopoly on force. the only organized force or semi
they will create, they will create incidents in that case allowing innocent people to be murdered by giving criminals guns in order to have a stronger anti-gun argument, you do sort of wonder are they just refuse to go answer questions about these gun buys, some of which we know are happening, why aren t they explaining it, to reduce responses from right wingers, look at the gun crowd. no, we only bought a million rounds not two million. if he we bought a billion rounds, that s the points. please note again, they can have guns, we can t. that s the only question with gun control, should the government and bloomberg, feinstein and jim carrey have a monopoly on force. that s the question. sean: you spoke at cpac and i want to play a clip of it, this is more of a political question. let s roll ann coulter and the incredible reaction at cpac. passion is great, but in politics, remember, boring is
they will create, they will create incidents in that case allowing innocent people to be murdered by giving criminals guns in order to have a stronger anti-gun argument, you do sort of wonder are they just refuse to go answer questions about these gun buys, some of which we know are happening, why aren t they explaining it, to reduce responses from right wingers, look at the gun crowd. no, we only bought a million rounds not two million. if he we bought a billion rounds, that s the points. please note again, they can have guns, we can t. that s the only question with gun control, should the government and bloomberg, feinstein and jim carrey have a monopoly on force. that s the question. sean: you spoke at cpac and i want to play a clip of it, this is more of a political question. let s roll ann coulter and the incredible reaction at cpac. passion is great, but in politics, remember, boring is
government? what is wrong with the government is we have come to expect too much from it. it takes too much of the wealth and suppresses too much of the freedom. it recognizes no limitation on its own powers and if it believes just because it does something, whatever it does is right and proper. it s too big. it stops too much wealth and has a monopoly on force and is ever-growing. beginning 100 years ago in the so-called progressive era, the government at every level in america began to strude on the lives intrude on lives of ordinary americans. with popular support of woodrow wilson, the federal government began to decide what food is worthy of production, and what salaries employers had to pay the workers, what criticism of the government was acceptable in public, how u.s. senators would be elected. how much of the income you could keep and whether or not you could consume alcoholic beverages. none of those powers were granted in the constitution so the fed assumed the powers for
enterprise? in florida, legislationsthat been introduced to prevent toll-takers on toll booth on state highways to refuse to accept cash or any form larger than $20 bill. if you give them $50, they have the power to stop and question you about it. would you patronize a business that treated you like that? in congress is hopelessly deadlocked. the vice president in charged of bringing them together but he took off for moscow. you can t make this up. so congress spoon feeds the government for two weeks at a time. last year, the got borrowed $223 billion to pay interest on the old tab and run the government. would you invest in a business that proposed operate like that? of course not. what is the common thread here? as i said earlier, it s government, monopoly on force. it s come pulsion, that there