but there is a very clerical clus here, not just on family side, the personal side. also the money side. think about hillary clinton s don t ares, right? the clinton world has been known for a long time about, you know, keeping their enemies close and making sure that people stay on their side. so you re not going to see a situation like you do on the republican side where donors are giving to two candidates at the same time. i think that s really one of biggest factors here for joe biden. he s got staff out there that want to work for him. he s got, you know, the ability to pull a ground game together really quickly. question is whether or not donors will give to him without fear of retribution from clinton s campaign. what about just from money, jeff zeleny, to the thrust of his campaign? you talked about this letter from senator coffman to the biden network. what more have we gleaned from that as far as platform campaign? i know it s an optimistic
brackets. there are seven currently. you know, it would amount to he would basically this is the explanation. that s the tax cut. on the interest, getting the money side, he said, we ll get rid of deductions and loopholes. there are things that would hit corporate america, but the math doesn t seem to totally add up here, as is the case often with donald trump. it makes sort of when you hear it, yeah, we should pay lower taxes. people who don t make $50,000 should not have to pay taxes. it makes sense when you hear it. it s the details where the devil is. i think that s going to be a case here. at least to his credit he did put out a plan. he is really stayed away from specifics on everything, with the exception of immigration. at least he did put out a plan we can now look through and analyze, as opposed to saying, it s going to be great and everyone is going to be happy and we ll all be rich. we have new numbers on
cheryl: how they risk their lives, what they do, and also they risk their lives and dedication it takes. i had a friend went through seal training and he broke his ankle. he was out. it is incredible. what it takes just to get there. we were showing the book cover. one of the fascinating things they re going after royalties. if you want to figure out a way to prosecute the guy, fine. but to go after him financially, that surprises me a little bit here. that s, i love that point too. what is it they need? they need the million dollars that the book may get? what is it the government is after? maybe they re after him because his story doesn t comport exactly with the white house story. the fact that his story which is probably a lot truer than what the white house has to say is enough to rankle people in the white house and say, okay, let s go get this guy. apparently they can t get him for divulging classified information so let s get him on the money side. something is not right abou
biden to lithuania with. it is automatic that the united states is signed on to this nato treaty and if any come under attack, all of the nato countries step up to defend the country. but more importantly i think he is going to issue another round of sanctions or what else maybe happening to send a message to putin. sdwl what might they look like? more people with frozen accounts, more action on the financial front, they see the money side of things as the most powerful tool and believes they will crumble if they are put
of the company itself, like the reversal, how did they manage this, the whole messaging behind it. they were very blunt and open minded about it and open about it. they simply said we took the products off the shelf because we didn t want to offend anybody because of the comments from the from the star of the show. and then they said now we realized we ve done exactly what we didn t want to do. so what does it tell us? and what we re watching are companies doing do we, don t we. if we do, what happens? and going backwards and forwards. this is fascinating because here you have it played out in realtime. how much does it cost them to do this little dance? forget the money side of it. cracker barrel, that s really rather small change. it s the reputation is issue. they thought they were doing the right thing by taking them off the shelf. they now realize they shouldn t have done it because some people said and this is what