what they are worth, but money is coming from. you know, what? the thing is, michael, they are not skimping on the ceo salaries, though. where they are going, they re certainly not worrying about not paying the ceos millions and millions and millions of dollars. right. and that s the problem. they are still making money off of what good is a ceo without content for a company? and the problem is, one of the other problems is the, streaming services you don t where residual s come from, is when you re-air a show, you get to advertise again. and so, you share the profit for those advertising and what the streaming services say is, well, we don t get advertising money. so, we should not have to pay those residual rates. although, the reason netflix is successful is not because it has ten hit shows. it is because it has a bunch of hate shows that you can go on
obviously, remington and ale jones. on the alex jones stuff, the stuff that happened at fox robinson of that the idea that they knowingly spread falsehoods, and that wa profitable to them is that replaceable? because lots of people stand behind the first amendment and say we can we can say whatever we want to say and fox has man times that you shouldn t tak some of the things we say as true they knew that what they wer making money off of, telling their viewers, was stuff tha they knew not to be true o didn t believe themselves. in this instance, the courts also ended up playing a role o least the settlement did, th threat of a lawsuit ended up playing a role in the stopping of lives the increasing of the cost o lying. it s a historic case. i think of the alex jones case i think of the dominion case the upcoming smartmatic case, think the case against not
very dangerous products. the case is a very differen obviously, remington and ale jones. on the alex jones stuff, the stuff that happened at fox robinson of that the idea that they knowingly spread falsehoods, and that wa profitable to them is that replaceable? because lots of people stand behind the first amendment and say we can we can say whatever we want to say and fox has man times that you shouldn t tak some of the things we say as true they knew that what they wer making money off of, telling their viewers, was stuff tha they knew not to be true o didn t believe themselves. in this instance, the courts also ended up playing a role o least the settlement did, th threat of a lawsuit ended up playing a role in the stopping of lives the increasing of the cost o lying. then it s a historic case i think of the alex jones case i think of the dominion case the upcoming smartmatic case, think the case against not seize in charlottesville, it i all very important ways that w
at one point when the committee members actually asked mr. chew. you harvest the data all of all the americans that make money off of, it why have you been returning that money in some way to america? 90, i hang out in academic circles who hang out with these sort of things. i commend of acts have been pushing that idea about social media companies for a long time. so of course, this was mostly showmanship and it was not really an exchange of information going on these hearings. but, my gosh, it was so much more sophisticated of a response and questions that i have seen any american ceo subjected to. and so that means the big difference. it is amazing what geopolitics and geo phobia can do for a hearing. the washington post found that 41% of americans now support a ban on, tiktok but that poll makes clear who doesn t want tiktok banned. age 18 to 34 years, democrats will have to go against a key section of their base if they want to and then tiktok nationwide.
members actually asked mr. chew. you harvest the data all of all the americans that make money off of, it why have you been returning that money in some way to america? 90, i hang out in academic circles who hang out with these sort of things. i commend of acts have been pushing that idea about social media companies for a long time. so of course, this was mostly showmanship and it was not really an exchange of information going on these hearings. but, my gosh, it was so much more sophisticated of a response and questions that i have seen any american ceo subjected to. and so that means the big difference. it is amazing what geopolitics and geo phobia can do for a hearing. the washington post found that 41% of americans now support a ban on, tiktok but that poll makes clear who doesn t want tiktok banned. age 18 to 34 years, democrats will have to go against a key