laundered so much money for russians and they ve been fined over $20 billion in fines for wrongful conduct in the united states, germany and cyprus, that you sort of wonder, why hasn t its license to exist as a bank been taken away? yeah. i just want to get, this is the response to the new york times, a trump organization spokesperson denied the company needed outside funding for turnberry. this story is absolutely false. at no time was money needed for the purchase of refurbishment. what do you think of that? well, donald has a huge internal loan for the turnberry property. and that property has been a huge money loser for him. he claims it s worth $200 million. would you pay $200 million for a property that s been losing over $10 million a year for several years in a row?
tony. the answer was good ol usa? paycheck withdrawn. i completely agree with you. how does this work exactly? you re saying, melissa cities don t recoup what they spend. here in new york, with the super bowl. bring in all the money. you end up hiring all the security. they think tourists flood into town. half stay away because they re afraid of traffic and danger and everything else that comes with it. ends up being this huge cost. i would love you would? for fun of it. then you get the traffic and, no. money loser. it always ends up being a money loser. you know you pay for it. later taxpayers will be mad and just doesn t this point to a bigger issue of immigration? they re doing this because, according to the associated press a couple weeks ago latinos are on the verge of outnumbering whites. a lot of them are illegal immigrants. this is why trump is resonating. if they re doing this, it is
not anymore. they re one mouse click away from anything that you can imagine. playboy s strategy? go digital minus the raunchy stuff. last year playboy.com relaunched as a safe for work site. check out this gamers next door video shoot. there s barely any skin. the girls are tully dressed. we ve more than four times grown our traffic. it s not provocative to see nudity. in fact it can actually limit our audience. so maybe playboy is about the articles then. it s always been about the articles. and the magazine isn t going anywhere even though it s a money loser. playboy calls it an ambassador for the brand, one that feeds its real cash cow, or should i say cash bunny, licensing. a pair of socks don t have a dna. until you re able to imbue it with a narrative. that starts with the magazine. playboy did more than $1 billion in retail sales last
beneficial but across the country, absolutely not. we already have high-speed rail. if you want to get from denver to las vegas or dallas to phoenix, you take southwest airlines. that s a pretty quick service and it s pretty cheap. the problem is we do need infrastructure spending. and you can t trust politicians with money. 37% of recovery act went to unfunded pension liabilities. up to 40% of the gas tax goes to special projects. you cannot trust politicians and that is the problem with our infrastructure spending. gary k. where do you weigh in on this? california first said $30 billion. now it s $68 billion. which basically means $100 billion. they already admitted they need taxpayer subsidies up to a billion dollars a year and it always falls on the taxpayer. if you notice as said you don t see private companies jumping all over this because they know it s a money loser. think the big dig in massachusetts. it was supposed to cost $3 billion and ended up $15 billion and nine yea
he joins us today from denver. good morning bob. they re spending all this taxpayer money to say okay, use weed and here s how you do it legally and safely; right? our state is moving backwards. this is incredibly disappointing that we went from a campaign that said don t be a lab rat which started to educate youth and young adults about marijuana and not be a lab rat for the marijuana industry to this very weak new campaign. we know that the marijuana industry didn t like the initial campaign and in fact our state invited the marijuana industry to be part of the creation of this new campaign, which is completely outrageous. you say that this really is all about addiction. now that the i would imagine the state is making a lot of money on the taxes and now they re trying to get people hooked you say? look we know from commercialization of other drugs like tobacco that this is a money loser. the state is going to lose