just how dangerous would that be? it s very dangerous, and i hope they all lose. if you can t accept the result of this last election and you want to run, what s that going to do to the process? so i hope they all lose. it s terrible that that happened. by the way, interesting in michigan. this guy gibbs who beat meijer, meijer voted to impeach donald trump. the democratic party itself put money in, put money into the gibbs campaign because they thought he d be the weaker candidate and they were able to defeat meijer who actually stood up and voted to impeach trump. now, you go figure that one out. that s kind of wacky and not good for the future of the way we do elections in this country. it s a big risk. it s true, the dccc put all this money behind meijer s opponent who won last night. how much of a sure bet is it that he would lose in the general? it isn t a sure bet
money. he may very well have thought that given what he had already accomplished, the highest and best use of his remaining years was to spend that money helping humanity. it was just a few months back, if your company ended in dot-com it was a good thing. but at the end of this brutal week on wall street, a lot of analysts think the internet bubble is ready to burst, and by this time next year, a huge number of those dot-coms might be dot gone. a year ago, investors were so eager to buy into the internet they were happily ignoring traditional measures of success. sales, profits and growth. but reality has now set in. these upstarts didn t have any income. they were saying, we are worth billions of dollars. where s your revenue? they didn t have any. when the venture capitalists stopped putting money in, you could time the bubble. you could say you know, if we all believe this fantasy it works. if some of us stop believing,
he s a pragmatist, he doesn t approve want to spend big, so i was going to manage that and push some of his reforms, the issue of retirement is one which really bothers people here. but doesn t redo that, he isn t going to get the money in. he redo that, he isn t going to get the mone in. ., , redo that, he isn t going to get the mone in. , ., , money in. he has proposed this extension. money in. he has proposed this extension, his money in. he has proposed this extension, his response - money in. he has proposed this extension, his response to i money in. he has proposed this extension, his response to how| money in. he has proposed this i extension, his response to how to keep spending on health care and france s generous social system without raising massively taxes. his parishioners, people have to work longer to continue funding at that system. clearly, that s not a measure of it s going to be popular. he wants to raise the retirement age from 62 to 65. he wants to raise the r
accomplished, the highest and best use of his remaining years was to spend that money helping humanity. it was just a few months back, if your company ended in dot-com it was a good thing. but at the end of this brutal week on wall street, a lot of analysts think the internet bubble is ready to burst, and by this time next year, a huge number of those dot-coms might be dot gone. a year ago, investors were so eager to buy into the internet they were happily ignoring traditional measures of success. sales, profits and growth. but reality has now set in. these upstarts didn t have any income. they were saying, we are worth billions of dollars. where s your revenue? they didn t have any. when the venture capitalists stopped putting money in, you could time the bubble. you could say you know, if we all believe this fantasy, it works. if some of us stop believing, it s a prelude to its failure. most dot-com retail companies will be out of business by next
set up a charitable foundation were all net proceeds from the sale will be donated to the victims of ukraine and he also said he will not be calling in any loans. he has loaned chelsea one and a half billion pounds. if you consider the possible sums of money that the club could be “p sums of money that the club could be up for sale for in the region of around two and a half billion pounds, that s a huge amount of money that potentially roman abramovich is preparing to write off. the big question of course, what now for chelsea both on and off the field? , i, , , i, i, the field? presumably one of the considerations the field? presumably one of the considerations is the field? presumably one of the considerations is that the field? presumably one of the considerations is that at - the field? presumably one of the considerations is that at some i the field? presumably one of the i considerations is that at some point the british authorities might bring in sanctions which would pu