totally insulting, i ve seen things written like he s going to throw me under the bus. right. when they say that, he isn t but i have insurance. okay. so hours later giuliani clarified on twitter that his statement on having insurance was, quote, sarcastic, not necessarily sure i saw sarcasm there by the way. right, yeah. and relates to the files in my safe about the biden family s four decades of monetizing of his office. all right. president trump said on friday that he was angry with former ambassador to ukraine marie yovanovitch claiming without evidence that she refused to hang his picture in the u.s. embassy in ukraine. the ambassador, the woman she wouldn t even put up she s an obama person, you know. i said why are you being so kind? she s a woman. we have to be nice. this ambassador that everybody says is so wonderful, she wouldn t hang my picture in the embassy. okay? she s in charge of the embassy.
being sarcastic and it goes to files in my safe about the biden family s 4 decade monetizing of his office. giuliani is ramping up attacks, alleging biden confessed to committing bribery back in 2018 while also moving malleable senator lindsey graham into his crusade against the bidens, which is not sitting well with the former vice president. they re asking lindsey graham they have him under his thumb. they know if he comes out against trump, he has a real tough road for re-election, number one. i am disappointed and quite frankly i m angered by the fact that he knows me, he knows my son. he knows there is nothing to this. lindsey is about to go down in a way that i think he s going to regret his whole life. what do you say to him? i say, lindsey, i just i
neil: you don t see this every day to agree with regulators that when it comes to target companies like google and amazon and apple marsha blackburn joins us right now. good to have you. it is complement of events were a lot of republicans agree with a lot of democrats that they need watching. i tell you the time has come because for years to be concerned social media what we are doing with all of this information that they were scraping and using and monetizing and the big ad
not. that may or may not be happening. that s where i think these cases of shadow banning come in. a lot of times especially with politicians, we are talking about hot button issues, talking about issues that affect their constituents, talking about things that are in the news of the day if you are talking about some terrible news events, that might be flagged as let s put the pause on this because it might be. sandra: the question is does this go anywhere? he is specifically in his words saying that twitter is guilty of knowingly hosting and monetizing content that is clearly abusive, hateful, and defamatory. he is saying twitter created this, but twitter has not. twitter is the cable company and the tweets are the channels that are provided to the cable company so twitter is basically not even the arbiter of all of this. they are sitting there saying this is our platform, yes we make money off of it, yes we are doing searches and trying to put advertising in your feed, but
monetizing content that is clearly abusive, hateful and defamatory providing financial incentive to the defame is facilitating defamation on its platform. this includes implications that nunez colluded with prostitutes, does cocaine and invested in a winery that used underage hookers to solicit investment. he goes on to charge the twitter shadow band him in 2018 to restrict his free-speech and amplify the abusive and hateful content published and republished by liz mayer. devon nunez s mom, not his actual mom, the name of an account and other accounts in an effort to influence election results. how is it that every day those conservatives are being banned? they don t want to call it shadow banning, the fact is people cannot see my tweets,