sense that they are both fully cooperating in what we know at this time. the former president, it s a different ballpark. he was obstructing, he was trying to get these documents for months and months. i hope that the justice department looks at them based on the fact that they play out. one thing that i want to note, to andy mccabe s point, this might be a bigger problem than we think that it is. it s not just presidents and vice presidents who always have classified documents with them. the secretary of defense, the former secretaries of the states, national security advisers, the universe of people who have the ability to leave the complex with documents is actually quite large, and clearly, there is no processes for policing the chain of custody for these documents, which do expose grave national security risks. alyssa farah griffin, appreciated. mondare jones. glad to be here. coming up next, what we re learning and to mass shootings in california but the crimes, the respons
know for sure is that the white house has not changing its strategy, nor legal nor public strategy. they re not weighing in on this, focusing instead on the presidents agenda. in fact, anderson, behind closed doors today biden met with democratic leaders. their discussion was about the agenda. the economic speeches that he s planning on giving up ahead. there is no discussion at all about classified documents in that meeting inside of the white house. phil, we appreciate it, thank you. cnn s newest political commentator, mondare jones. also, cnn political commentator alyssa farah griffin who served at director of communications in the previous administration. governor, great to have you here. does the mike pence revelation help the biden white house? i think it does. there are clear distinctions now if you group pence and biden in one category. and the former president donald trump who did not honor a lawfully issued subpoena and as a result had to have those things taken back by t
red flag laws if someone doesn t like the cut of your jib you lose your constitutional right. now that s baldly unconstitutional and you know it is because democrats are suddenly talking about packing the score in order to make it law. watch. you will not stop us from advancing the protecting our kids act today. you will not stop us from passing it in the house next week, and you will not stop us there. if the filibuster obstructs us, we will abolish it. if the supreme court objects, we will expand it. and we will not rest until we have taken weapons of war out of circulation in our community. each and every day, we will do whatever it takes to end gun violence, whatever it takes. tucker: uh-huh. in our communities. really? what s the murder rate in your community, pal, and what exactly have you done to make it better? nothing. mr. jones wants power they all do and to that end he wants to end the filibuster destroy the
entire judiciary to, quote, end gun violence. a move like that raises a lot of questions, for example, does mondare jones have any idea what he s talking about like the details, because you re a lawmaker. fox s hillary vaughn caught up with him wanting to know what weapons of war he wanted to ban. interesting exchange watch this. you mentioned you want weapons of war out of circulation. what is a weapon of war to you. assault weapon. assault weapon. is that like semiautomatic handguns and rivals. semiautomatic weapons would qualify as assault weapons and they should be banned. that would take almost every gun out of people s hands. that s not true. handguns for example would not qualify under what i just described. i m sorry. i ve got to go. okay. tucker: so, yes, mondare jones just explained, yeah, all semiautomatic weapons which
hillary vaughn says handguns, yes, handguns. you want to take people s hands guns away? no that wouldn t qualify as assault weapons even though he just defined it as any semiautomatic weapon. so clearly mondare jones knows what hillary vaughn was trying to tell him that most firearms in this country including most handguns are quote semiautomatic weapons. we don t have 22 calibers that aren t causing a ton of school shootings. but when she points this out he runs away. and probably not back to his district to lower the murder rate. he just didn t want to get into details. so what are we looking at. today a guy onle twitter spike cohen summed it up nicely. the us government has been arming ukraine because they re allies. the us government has been seeking to disarm russia because they re opponents. in totally unrelated news, the us government seeks to disarm you. well, exactly. that s the framing. that s the truth. anyone who tries to disarm you by definition considers you an