they said and it had been reported that five foreign agencies hacked into hillary s server in the mom-and-pop bathroom closet. here s my question. that means they exist. wikileaks is a separate issue. they have always said it s not russia. but if james comey s original piece said these entities had hacked into it, that means other countries likely have them. so wouldn t it mean we would be able to recover those emails? because i don t believe these 33,000 emails about any one wedding, funeral, or yoga that exist on this planet. you don t believe it. i don t believe it. the american people don t believe it because as we look at 30,000 emails, getting rid of those, isn t it interesting there may be more foreign governments with hillary clinton s emails than congress or those who are going after it. i just find it inexcusable. as we looked at this, the bigger picture really right now is, are we going to get to the bottom of it.
months before the investigation, before the hillary interview. they said and it had been reported that five foreign agencies hacked into hillary s server in the mom-and-pop close closet. that means they exist. wikileaks is a separate issue. they have always said it s not russia. but if james comey s original piece said these entities had hacked into it, that means other countries likely have them. so wouldn t it mean we would be able to recover those emails? because i don t believe these 33,000 emails about any one wedding, funeral, or yoga that exist on this planet. you don t believe it. i don t believe it. the american people don t believe it because as we look at 30,000 emails, getting rid of those, isn t it interesting there may be more foreign governments with hillary clinton emails than congress or those who are going after it. i just find it inexcusable. as we looked at this, the bigger
they are so burdensome, they are impossible to comply with. it s basically de facto prohibition. tucker: you started your company by yourself, you are an immigrant, you are a lawyer. you came to this country, how many employees when you starteda three employees. tucker: how many now? about 2500-3500 directly or indirectly. tucker: that s unbelievable. the terrifying thing about this is it doesn t seem as much you can do. what to do if you are a business and you learn that some regulation has been written by an unelected bureaucrat that can destroy you? it s going to wipe out 70% ot these family-owned manufacturing factories and companies that have been created and descended- over generations. about 50% of these mom-and-pop retail stores in mainstream america are going to be jobless and out of business because we can t introduce new products to them. the cost of constituent testingc chemical testing. they don t even have machines for things like that. the warning stickers th
these rules are so outrageous, they are so burdensome they are impossible to comply with. it s basically de facto prohibition. tucker: you started your company by yourself, you are an immigrant, you are a lawyer. who came to this country, how many employees when you started? three employees. tucker: how many now? about 2500-35 directly or indirectly. tucker: that s unbelievable. the terrifying thing about this as it doesn t seem as much you can do. what to do if you are a business and you learn that some regulation has been written by an unelected bureaucrat that can destroy your? it s going to wipe out 70% of these family-owned manufacturing factories and companies that have been created and descended over generations. about 50% of these mom-and-pop retail stores in mainstream america are going to be jobless and out of business because we can t introduce new products to them. the cost of constituent testing, chemical testing. they don t even have machines for things like t
is it possible he got it from one source and the russians did have it? is it possible everybody had it because she went to a mom-and-pop shop bathroom and broke the law and committed felonies in the process of not handling classified information the way it should ve been handled? more importantly, sean, this whole discussion is meant to distract from the content of the disclosures. they show hillary clinton to be greedy, corrupt, up to her nose in campaign dirty tricks, and to distract from the fact that the obama justice department and the obama fbi utilized with a new was fabricated evidence to justify legally the surveillance of the republican candidate for president. this is an abuse of power that makes watergate look like small potatoes. it is obvious that the question that must bepo asked based on te fbi text messages, is with that obama know and when did he know