i don t know if you folks are aware of what s happening. we want to have strong borders in the united states. democrats don t want us to have strong borders only for one reason, because i want it. that s what you re fighting for. when you think about it, you re fighting for borders in other countries. and they koent want to fight the democrats for the border of our country. doesn t make a lot of sense. critics, katherine, said he should have kept politics out of his speech there to the troops. at the same time, was anybody surprised that this is where he went? it s hard to believe anyone was surprised. because one of the things we ve seen two years in with president trump is that politics is injected into basically every moment. there aren t a lot of times where he puts on an official presidential hat and does something in a big, neutral way. that s just not his style. right. if something is on his mind he s going to keep talking about it, as he did.
they re not even going to touch it. it s interesting, too, politics is very much in play. they voted for the secure fence act and this is similar legislation, steel slats, whatever you want to call it. trump calls it the wall. they want nothing to do with it. immigration has divided the parties like the grand canyon, right? next year what we re going to see is democrats highlighting policies they believe show a heartless administration, whether it was family separation, stopping asylum, ending daca for dreamers and trying to blame democrats for this death at the border wall. we re already seeing beto o rourke, who some think will run for president on 2020. they said the southern border already has over 600 miles of wall or fence since 2007, undocumented immigrant population has grown more, visa
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20181230:13:29:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
hay go by fast so i put them together to read them and enjoy them slowly. i read them and there is a lot of stuff i got wrong. i was wrong on bernie sanders in the sense i mocked him a lot and i realize that that is that is equivalent of mocking trump. you are overlooking the appeal, the specific appeal to an audience. i sat there he is an old socialist from vermont which is accurate but i realize i m not giving him credit he deserves. there are other clichés. the most mistakes were because of emotional decisions. when you write and think about a topic you have to think about it with the persuasion in mind and not emotion. that is what i have learned. the stuff i get wrong is when you inject too much emotion into something. that is my feeling. dagen: that is why people love you, because you inject emotion in what you do.
a trump presidency in a text with his girlfriend, lisa page. according to the ig report, page was a high-ranking fbi attorney who was used by andrew mccabe. yeah, that andrew mccabe. of course they bypass the fbi s chain of command and he got to manager the clinton investigation. next we knew peter strzok, andrew weissmann, those names sound familiar? those anti-trump democratic donors had the same people to finish the exoneration of hillary and put the fix in and tapped by robert mueller for his trump-russia witch hunt. many of those same agents that cleared hillary, they were then immediately appointed to investigate trump. the very agents hatred about trump, vowing to stop his presidency, mocking trump supporters, the same people tapped to investigate trump.