first started criticizing, i thought we were at the brink of war the way the president was dealing with it. but he has gotten results. the shift of tone from the president is because you re hearing things from north korea like we will get rid of our nuclear weapons. that s been reported. we ll see if it goes through once the president meets with them. they haven t committed to that, all right. but they re having conversations. there hasn t been any conversation before this president started. yes the name-calling, many called it petty. but he has gotten him to the table. as kim jong-un is coming through the table the president is now using looser language. whenever i hear that, i scratch my head. i mean, you call the president s words, not you personally, but others call it petty. well what category do you put a guy who kills his own peep? right. petty versus i think if you ask joy behar she puts him as morally superior to the president.
who have people not jumping to conclusions saying, um, let s being cautious e who is ushs kau. he s damned if he does or he s damned if he doesn t rnts he s not damned at all. if he sends in mike pompeo, he s somehow a pass efficient? right a pacifist. i hear what you are saying, jessica. the idea that let s at least talk about the risks, kwhaefer. but when i say it s gotten political, it s not a discussion about risk and better ideas. it s just the determination that this might not be the president to get it done. i m curious why do democrats think that? that this isn t the president to get it done? yes. they don t trust him on foreign policy. obama didn t get it done in eight years. but george bush didn t get it done. not a new thing that north korea is a threat to us. it seems like a shift in tone. first he was too hard on the
because the meetings the president is having with president macron are going long. when the president opened up that pool spray as we call it in the cabinet room, he said they talked at length in the oval office and could have kept going. he said we could have been there two to three hours. as the day is only scheduled for president macron, the president has all of the time that he wants. north korea is on the agenda, the president saying that negotiations toward a silt-down between himself and kim jong-un are going very well, he is looking forward to it, quote, we think we can do something very special. after the president deriding kim jong-un, mocking imon twitter, calling him little rocketman at his speech at the united nations, the president describing kim in a different way, a different tone, saying that kim jong-un has been very open and we think very honorable from what we have seen. that prompted a question from
good of the rld would. and maybe it does bring us closer to i want to bring in north korea. we know that that is also a discussion had in the white house right now. as john roberts pointed out in the reporting from the white house the president talked about negotiations with kim jong-un is are going very well. he used to call the leader of north korea little rocketman. roberts was pointing out a change in tone of his own change in tone when it comes to kim jong-un, he s talking about him and referring to him as honarable. listen. jpt kim jong-un, really has been very open, and i think very honorable from everything we re seeing. lawrence jones, open and honorable, words used to describe the north korean dictator. a classic negotiation strategy from this president. i was one of the peep w478 he first start people when he