house at the time. here s the other question and i just realized this today, maybe this is been obvious all along, sometimes i get things wrong in the old rain. there are two grand juries operating in d.c.. both about cases pertaining to the president. one of them pertaining the january six investigation, one of them pertaining to the documents. i ve missed a cleat but the documents on mar-a-lago was happening in fortnite, it s not. kash patel appeared before that grand jury. there was some speculation today that they were both in there for a long time. at one point there were a pairing before two branches. is there any way for us to know is that just inside the black box? wow, i don t think there s any way to know without very detailed information. i will say though that for example just for efficiency sake, all before of one grand jury they could read in that testimony into another grand jury. i also would say path cipollone does have information in the documents case because o
purchased twitter. and he s been making a very big public show of committing himself to a form of free speech absolutism, which in this case, mostly means restoring the accounts of bigots. and yesterday, a little neo-nazi. but kanye decided to see how far he could push it, and he called elon s bluff, it s like watching too stoned people argue in a dorm late at night. so, last night, he posted a frankly shocking image that he apparently created in photoshop, depicting a swastika inside a star david. and then, musk was forced to suspend kanye in response for spreading hate speech to his 32 million followers. so, you know, we found the line, i guess. now, that decision was roundly criticized by musk s fanboys who saw this a duck rail of his supposed free speech principles. if you are not, musk s gonna get back in the good graces of the maga crowd, a stunt today, claiming to blow the whistle on it, you guessed it, the most
course he was involved on the last of the presidency and making sure that the documents are going to be going into the right place and we re going to be in fire s hands. it also seems to, me, again we re trying to judge these timelines from outside here. but it did seem that obviously whatever potential january six as a mo complicated case in the dawkins case. i think that s established and we all know that. i guess the question is what is your expectation or sense of the timeline here on both these cases but particularly the documents case if they re taking gradually testimonies as they did with kash patel if they have the evidence is going to be turned over by the special master was struck down. i really think the documents case has got to be almost ready to charge in the late stage because it s so straightforward, chris. it s almost like a drug case where if you have circuit documents in your basement or your closet you ll likely committed a crime so i think what they did with k
so i called the barnes firm, it was the best call i could ve made. call the barnes firm now, a day after the 11th circuit and find out what your case could be worth. call one eight hundred, eight million court of appeals ruled to get rid of the special master case the clock is ticking. there s the thursday deadline for evidence collected from trump s home to be turned over to jack smith. meanwhile, trump white house counsel pat cipollone and his deputy patrick fill men were both back at the d.c. federal courthouse today following their brief appearance back in september. back in september, that court date, both of them came in and left shortly after they asserted executive privilege as donald trump bought a secret court battle to keep their testimony from the grand jury. but trump failed in that effort. and today cipollone spent
party magazine cover, not magazine cover so much anymore, back in my youth we did. i remember mick warner, a deaf politician it turned out it was not my corner. there s been a lot of those, there s a little bit of that with iran desantis. i think he can make the case a little bit where he say maybe better on paper that in person. most people. our presidential candidate is just entirely different. it s entirely different beast, it s hard to describe if you re not through it. it is a prompt a logical exam every day. and very few people come much stronger on the other hand then they went into it because it just choose you up. there s nothing really like it on the planet in terms of the scrutiny. and some people can rise to that. trump clearly has damaged goods but he relishes in the combat. he didn t look like in florida