Stephen P. Kranz engages in all forms of taxpayer advocacy, including audit defense and litigation, legislative monitoring, and the formation and leadership of taxpayer coalitions.
Jim has extensive experience in handling labor and employment law litigation in federal and state courts, and before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the Department of Justice, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and several state agencies.
Patricia Anderson Pryor is an experienced litigator in both state and federal courts, representing and defending employers in nearly every form of employment litigation, including class actions.
Legal Disclaimer
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.
anybody s attempt to intimidate or coerce, or obstruct justice, by reaching out to potential witnesses who are going to testify. i ve seen people get five years in prison for this, fred. this is very, very serious. and the operative language in the tweet that he made was, your wife s going to find out soon. that s bad for this guy, fred. i don t care how you color this, that is witness intimidation. it is hard for people not to see that as witness intimidation or a threat, right, avery? that s right. and let me, there s another part of this, of course, he apologized afterwards, whether or not he was sincere, let me tell you something, that may or may not be a mitigator, that doesn t neutralize the crime, or the unethical behavior, but when the spokesperson comes out and says it is frivolous, it basically trivializes the behavior. so where he gets off saying, well, this is witness testing, there s no such thing, it doesn t work, either it s tampering or intimidation.