modelling of variations in temperature and sea level rises and greenhouse emissions, we are at the front foot greenhouse emissions, we are at the front foot greenhouse emissions, we are at the front foot that we are at the forefront front foot that we are at the forefront of front foot that we are at the forefront of all of those things. it forefront of all of those things. it is a forefront of all of those things. is a race. forefront of all of those things. it is a race. the future of fiji and the pacific islands will depend on whether they can find innovative ways to diversify their economies, and thrive in spite of the threat of climate change. and whether they can build a future which gives the young population a reason to stay. well, the future of those adorable children may lie in how well pacific island nations cooperate on key issues in the future. that was the central theme at this year s pacific islands forum back injuly. the first time regional leaders w
Previous image
Next image
“From the research of the MIT Task Force on the Work of the Future, so far, one thing is absolutely clear: Technological change is transforming our work, our lives, and our society and fortunately, the harsh societal consequences that concern us all are not inevitable,” said MIT President L. Rafael Reif at the start of “From Research to Action: Work of the Future,” on Feb. 19.
The event was the second in the MIT Forefront series, which seeks to find bold, new answers to urgent global problems. It reached more than 33,000 people from all over the world and featured discussion among industry, labor, and education leaders about how to create greater shared prosperity.
here. thank you. pete: i will go right to that initial question what are our next steps following this provocative move from jim congress u.n. we made it clear attack on guam or any of our territories would result in the regime s destruction. it starts there with deterrence. a credible deterrence. i think we have made that very very clear to the regime. pete: it feels like the same tit-for-tat. we said we want to end strategic patience. it feels like hey, don t do that did you it don t do that how do you prevent this cycle where they continue to test and eventually get to ultimate goal which is a nuclear weapon capable of striking our homeland. that is the ultimate goal that nuclear weapon capable of striking homeland. ultimate deterrent for kim jong un. he thinks he needs it forefront in his mind is the fate of other dictators like saddam and qaddafi who lacked weapons of destruction. diplomacy hasn t worked. sanctions haven t been enforced effectively. we need to continue along