And i think it would make sense that, at that time, or even before then, when were recommending an alternative to come back to you to tell you why were recommending an alternative. As karen mentioned, we have to really address the force main. So, the tunnel will convey sanitary flow, which Green Infrastructure is not a solution, but the storm Water Management portion and commands him a its a sweet spot given that having localized flood. So, what we will do is come back to you with some range of options that we looked at them and then come and talk about what were recommending at that time. Hopefully, that will help since were no measuring a lot of Green Infrastructure, hopefully while some data to base our selection on. Yes. I know theres relative sense of urgency on this. So, what that might do for the timeline for the overall business ip well i think will be important as well. As we [inaudible] spent a lot on this project. Just to get an understanding that would be helpful as we go a
Thats where the rubber would hit the road because we be hurting at that point in time. So, i recommendation at this point would be to increase the excess use charge to three times, believe the reduction level at 25 for interruptible customers as well. Whats in front of us actually is different than that is in it but yes. Its a 30 reduction for interruptible customers. Im recommending at this point do we limit that to 25 because were actually getting the performance at a people. Im not sure we need to bump that up but deftly bump up the penalties so [inaudible] have to pay more if they screw up i like to keep it at the higher level. I understand people and performing very well and with that hopefully will mean nobody runs into these limits. These are folks that have been getting a rate reduction and i think we really need to make sure the reduction that we water is greater than for people not getting that great benefit. Its a small increments. Just to maintain the integrity of the rates
Be hurting at that point in time. So, i recommendation at this point would be to increase the excess use charge to three times, believe the reduction level at 25 for interruptible customers as well. Whats in front of us actually is different than that is in it but yes. Its a 30 reduction for interruptible customers. Im recommending at this point do we limit that to 25 because were actually getting the performance at a people. Im not sure we need to bump that up but deftly bump up the penalties so [inaudible] have to pay more if they screw up i like to keep it at the higher level. I understand people and performing very well and with that hopefully will mean nobody runs into these limits. These are folks that have been getting a rate reduction and i think we really need to make sure the reduction that we water is greater than for people not getting that great benefit. Its a small increments. Just to maintain the integrity of the rates. So would you like to make a motion . Yes. Ill move
That s just the tip of the iceberg of the many significant stories we highlighted between July and December. Catch up on those storylines and photographs in our Year in Review Part II. Hope you enjoy!
A company operating a sand mining facility in Alameda County must pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to settle allegations it discharged untreated wastewater into Alameda Creek last year, state officials said last week.