i have to reassert the fact that 90% of the iraqi people are really good people. and this guy is attempting to impose his will, which is somewhat evil, on people who just want to make a living and see their children grow up. i want to restate that, that this is an interesting approach by a man who has got a very evil ideology. let s shift to the u.s. mission in iraq. the white house announced this week that it s boosting the number of troops deployed to help secure the uss embassy in baghdad and the nearby airport. joint chiefs chairman martin dempsey insisted this is not an echo of street nam. list of vietnam. there is this mission creep. that s the wrong phrase. the issue is mission match. we ll match the resources we apply with the authorities and responsibilities that go with them based on the mission we undertake. that is to be determined.
disagree saying, it s not mission creep but instead, mission match. what does that mean? parching words there, because i think they realize that as their doing their initial assessment of the iraqis, they believe that the iraqis are not capable as a force to do what needs to be done, and that will probably require some outside help, and that outside help right now looks to be us. and then, talk to me about the might and the real threat of isis? does it pose we know it poses a threat to iraqi forces, why they re asking for assistance, but what kind of direct impact or threat may it have to the u.s.? the u.s. personnel that there are? yes, i think that s important. we have to recognize that if there s a threat to u.s. national interests that would be the deciding factor on whether we go back in. that threat will be, if isis is able to set up this cdesert are