I did review the 311 notice and the plans that were provided by the neighbor. It was clear that the notice itself was the new notice from 2017. It clearly stated it was going to four stories. The plans that they have are the old plans from 2013, 2014. I have no way of knowing if those are the plans that were included with that notice last year because those plans were only dated as to when they were, you know, drawn by the designer. Not when they were mailed out or included in the 311 packet. So i cant corroborate that is the those are the actual plans that were sent with that 311 notice, whether thats the truth or not. All i do know that issue was not raised in the appeal. It was not raised in a brief. It has not been raised by any neighbors to our knowledge to either the project sponsor or the department staff. That includes potentially being raised by the neighbor to the north who originally dred the project and chose not to dr it based on revised plans. In order to get anymore info
Keeping hard copies of jobs that go out in terms how long they keep those physical documents. I havent had a chance to request that. Because it appears that the transmittal of information from the Planning Department to repo mill were correct. That is the only kind of area that we havent been able to explore thoroughly yet. I want to follow up the 3 11 notice has a description that referenced a four story project. It definitely referenced the newer plans. They are not what the old plans were, as mentioned. Thank you. Commissioners the matter is submitted. Time is over. I will start. One, it is really difficult to hear a case just orally, and that is why briefs are submitted and had certain questions been asked maybe some of those could have been answered here this evening. Other than that, i feel that this is a conforming project. It has gone on a long time there. Are no exemptions, no rare variances required. I feel a reason to deny the appeal and accept the project as it is. So if th
Broadcasting todays hearing. And item two, please . Item two, chairs report, this is an information item. Thank you. Colleagues, this has been an exciting month for the Transportation Authority. Last friday i was very happy to join with commissioner kims office to to the cal tran and the chp, and the federal highway administration, and the metropolitan commission, and this was the first major capitol project delivered by the traness powertation authority. And the new ramps provide safe access, and are the first of many Infrastructure Projects planned for the Treasure Island and yerba buena island, i want to con gr congratulate the director, and for competing the 98 Million Dollar project on time and on budget. And i also would like to congratulate cal trans in the opening of the bike and the pedestrian an path, connect tg to the island on sunday. And this regional link was much anticipated on by many people. And a lot of people are going to benefit from this improved access. And so thi
The minutes of the october 18 regular meeting any Public Comment boomer . Know mister chairman moved and seconded. All those in favor say, aye so ordered. Item 5 communications. German nolan directors none. Item 6 introduction of new or Unfinished Business by Board Members 52 things to bring up with from the headlines. The first is if we could perhaps get clarification or update on the Service Animal policy. I know that was a new story that was kind of waiting around and i think that its one of those things theres a lot of misinformation out there. You hear a lot of things dogs are okay if they paid up there. Service animals always okay maybe we could clarify that not just for our benefit for the publics benefit. Also for the police will actually have to enforce it if its ever enforce. Then the second one is this is something that we been hearing a lot of correspondence on. The diy street changes being done by an organization in San Francisco and i know there is such a public appetite
Diy street changes being done by an organization in San Francisco and i know there is such a public appetite for Street Safety and while we are diligently working through all of these things i think that the d i y st. Changes are removed from sf mta gets a bit confusing for people so maybe we could get a memo on that and answer specifically some of the email questions that come to us. I just feel that we sort of open to the public to explain how street changes go through and why we would like to see them go faster, what is our policy in terms of the need to go through the process in order to make sure were not only kidding everybody safe with our not leaving ourselves exposed to lawsuits and making the right changes in the right place on our schedule. Members consent will ask director reiskin to come back and report on those items. Ms. Boomer item 7 directors report. Good afternoon members of the chair and numbers of the Board Members of the staff here at. I want to give you a vision z