Tonight, now facing multiple charges including second degree murder. And cnn has learned that father telling investigators he bought that gun for his son as a holiday president which, would make the purchase, just months after authorities contacted the family, all investigating school shooting threats. I m kaitlan collins and this is the source authorities in georgia tonight, wasting no time. Because just a day after that mass shooting at apalachee high school in winder, georgia, the father of the 14yearold suspect is now facing charges of his own he is charged with the following four counts of involuntary manslaughter two counts of second degree murder and eight counts of cruelty to children mr. Gray, these charges stem from mr. Gray knowingly allowing his son colt, to possess a weapon our law enforcement team tonight confirms this is just the second time a parent of an accused school shooter has been charged in relation to the crime. The first of course, the parents of the michigan s
Cases. The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussio
The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussion unles
Policies. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The decision ended a nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce it against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agencys discretion unless it restricts it and nothing requires the department , a Law Enforcement agency, to not enforce the law. Second, this was reasonable. Daca was a measure that could be rescinded at any time, and the departments reasonable concern about its legality and its general opposition to broad nonenforcement policies provided more than a reasonable basis for ending it. After all, an agency is not required to push its legally dubious power to not enforce the law to its logical extreme. Undermines competency in the rule of law itself and conflicts with the agencies Law Enforcement mission. I would like to begin with the review ability question. If the attorne
Now to a hearing on diversity and inclusion in the Intelligence Community. Witnesses included three officials from military and civilian Intelligence Agency who talked about recruitment efforts to include more women and people of color into the workforce. The committee will come to order. Before we begin i want to remind you we are in open session and as such we will discuss unclassified matters only without objection, the chair may declare a recess at anytime. I welcome our members and witnesses to todays hearing. Im grateful you joined us today to discuss the mission imperative in the Intelligence Community, significant improvement of Diversity Inclusion at all levels entrylevel to Senior Leadership and within all disciplines. There has been some improvement in recent years the demographic profile of the workforce still does not mirror of the Wider Population is lighting and attracting the best and brightest from all walks of life. Only taking advantage of the diverse and correct inn