Government on the planet to declare a climate emergency. But climate experts say that the Emergency Response never came. For the greens, cutting emissions is one of their main objectives. It is a key policy area. So this is seen as a huge failure for them. Today, the co leader of the scottish greens accuse the snp of selling out future generations. She also said that humza yousaf can no longer be trusted. So it appears that it had become impossible for the two parties to continue working together. So what happens next . The snp leader will now form a Minority Government until the next Scottish Parliament elections in 2026. Live to glasgow and lets talk to Political Comentator brian taylor, who was the bbc s former Political Editor at bbc scotland. Thank you forjoining us. I wondered if i could get your reaction, having covered the scottish politics for many decades, due todays events. fix, many decades, due todays events. Remarkable set of events. I think humza yousaf was in difficult
it opened doors that were closed to others. that was fundamentally unjust. and it did not solve the mismatch problem. a lot of that folks that went through those same programs, they never actually caught up to the other levels because of the mismatch. if you give a person an artificial boost, that acts as a crutch. and that crutch actually hurts the people you re trying to help. and the thing with the case of harvard, there is no end point, when will they ever stop racial balancing if they believe that this is a structurally racist society, it s inevitable that they are trapped in our races, then they will never stop. that s what the supreme court pointed out. there is no end point under the critical race theory model and that means you trap minorities at the bottom because you re telling them you cannot on your own make it. that message is just wrong. roger, thank you so much for joining us. we appreciate your time. coming up, dangerously high temperatures, severe storms and smo
requisitions to all black schools. it should be like the scalias and the thomases on the court if they really cleve to this originalist theory of the constitution who actually uphold affirmative action and say, no it would be judicial activism to step in. there is an empirical problem but also a constitutional problem. as an empirical matter, if your listening want to google richard sander pope sinner, he does a very good job of marshalling the state of play with respect to empirical evidence. there is something very much to this mismatch problem. and again, it s just common sense that if you have students who have significantly lower academic qualifications than the rest of the student body, there is going to be a problem with them i got to say, roger, i ve been a college professor for going on 15 years now.
get in the car and they spotted three more kids inside. the parents were in court thursday on child abuse and endangerment charges. the children now in protective custody. i ll have more headlines at the top of the hour. your bottom line starts right now. the future of your health care is at stake, will the supreme court strike down president obama s landmark health care reform law? good morning, i m christine romans. the u.s. supreme court will announce its ruling but the public has spoken. a recent poll found 43% of americans say they re in favor of the health care law. 51% of americans say they oppose it. important to point out of those who oppose it, two-thirds say it s too liberal, the rest say they think the law should go further. the issue before the supreme court is not is it a good law, but is it constitutional? there are several possible outcomes. the court could strike down the law entirely or just a single provision in the law, it could also uphold the law e