claudine gay resigned after all that fierce pack backlash after her antisemitism after dozens of alleges of plagiarizing other people s work. she says she is the victim. this is outnumbered, we ll do victim busting. i m harris faulkner, here is my co-host emily compagno, and dagen mcdowell and cat-4 and former biden campaign surrogate kevin walling. calls for claudine gay to resign began after her shocking testimony last month when she failed to say calls for genocide of jews on campus would violate the school s conduct policy. calling for genocide of jews violates harvard code of conduct, correct? it depends on the context. it does not depend on the context, the answer is yes and you should resign. harris: despite all the condemnation, claudine gay waited a full month before resigning and did not apologize and said it has been distressing to have doubt cast of my commitment to confronting hate, two bedrock values fundamental to who i am and frightening to be attacked
4.8 magnitude earthquake hitting the northeast was shaking, felt across several states travel is now being impacted in an around new york city was mistaken identification and errors in decision-making that from the israel defense forces, newly released initial findings into the airstrikes that killed seven aid workers in gaza. we re going to tell you how the idf is responding and the biden administration s reaction to the report. numbers from from the new jobs report and come in way higher than expected. there are they so high that the federal reserve might scrap planned interest rate cuts were following these major developing stories and many more all coming in right here to cnn news central we re following breaking news out of the northeast are rare, 4.8 magnitude earthquake shaking the tri-state area today, the epicenter was in new jersey, but people felt shaking as far north as main all the way down to the washington, dc area? yeah. the good news is the right now at
reputation, her leadership was dragging them down. they can take this moment and say, not again, not anymore and instill a president that will push back on the ridiculously racist and antisemitic views they call racist because it is anything but. harris: you can t get beyond the point of what emily is saying tlchl is flip of a switch that has gone on in our society and seeing victims, it started with crime and soft on crime policies and giving criminals more of a break than victims and misidentifying who the victims are in all of this. why do we keep doing that? kevin: good question. what we ve seen in the wake of october 7 is rise of antisemitism. you have 73% of jewish students on college campuses that have said they witnessed antisemitism in this last academic year and
that she believed that, that that is her honest recollection, that she is not being deceptive in that? yeah she is, she is clear. there is no misconception of her misidentifying who was in that room, correct. finally, we said earlier polygraphs are not always admissible in court or rarely admissible in court. they re used to dispute in the scientific community. to those who don t put weight in these findings what do you say? i ll never be able to convince anybody that does not believe in polygraph that it works. the only thing i can say is i conducted the polygraph test in the higher standards. the department of defense is the one that does all the research with polygraph that i administer and what is administered in the federal government. the test that i administered which is called the federal u-phase which is one of the validate and had highly accurate polygraph tests. so i don t do the research, i don t get involved in it but iz rely on the research and the department of d
i don t know what doctor ford said prior. my total communication with dr. ford was strictly that hour and a half of the polygraph. i don t know what she said before. you have to talk to experts who interview victims of sexual assault. to me from a professional standpoint as a former fbi agent. i don t think it s a huge discrepancy. we re concerned is testing what happened in the room that night. you have no doubt in your professional opinion that what she wrote down in her written to you and went over with you. that she that she believed that. that is her honest recollection she is not being deceptive in that? yes. she is clear. no misconception of her misidentifying who was in the room. correct. just finally we said the earlier polygraphs are not