State, county and local government. in 58, the chairman, chairperson of the chamber of commerce of charlotte introduced a report and proposed a bill, proposed a bill calling for the prohibition of collective bargaining race, not only to prohibition, but to make it illegal for all public sector workers to join the union. my understanding is that there was even a misdemeanor law on the books in north carolina that it was illegal to be a member of a union which is, obviously, plainly and patently unconstitutional because you had the freedom of association in this country and that was struck down by the supreme court, but kept on the books in north carolina. yes. now, i want to ask this question. yes, absolutely. in fact go ahead. the north carolina public service workers union had to challenge that and they had to get a print change because
Graduate, they do have their degrees, will then become a legal or of status citizen in this country and then can contribute to this economy legally? well, certainly not. they re trying to. they have to say that they re in the process of trying to get their legal status, but of course steve s groups is trying to prevent them from getting the status. there s no guarantee, especially if steve has his way, they re going to keep these thumbs under their under their thumb as long as possible. the kids didn t break the law. the parents may have brought them in under their status, but even murder ris kids in california get in state tuition, access to scholarships. why we punishing kids whose parents may have broken a misdemeanor law in california when those same folks are working hard in nine field in the fields, growing our food, building our homes, they re taking care of our kids, they re cleaning our houses, and all they want is for their children to have the opportunity, same opportuni
Illegally. we re going to send out posse and deputy sheriff s. if we come across any people here pursuant to our duties, we re going to arrest them, turn them over to i.c.e. or book them into our jails. but if there are already programs under which local police can help enforce federal law, why do you need this arizona law? well, this law that the part she struck out so far, when we come across an illegal immigrant, i was hoping that we could arrest that person under that misdemeanor law in lieu of turning them over to i.c.e. right now we ll keep turning them over to i.c.e. we will do our duties, doing our enforcement. if we come across any illegal aliens, we re going to do what we ve been doing three years, enforcing the human smuggling law, state laws. we ve been doing it. 40,000 people, we have arrested, detained or investigated in our jails. i would like to have seen this law go through but we re still going to do what we have been doing. why would you prefer to hold
That misdemeanor law in lieu of turning them over to i.c.e. right now we ll keep turning them over to i.c.e. we will do our duties, doing our enforcement. if we come across any illegal aliens, we re going to do what we ve been doing three years, enforcing the human smuggling law, the employer sanction law. those are both state laws. we ve been doing it. 40,000 people, we have arrested, detained or investigated in our jails. i would like to have seen this law go through but we re still going to do what we have been doing. why would you prefer to hold them in your jails as opposed to just turning them over to federal immigration authorities? because under current law, you can just turn the illegals over to federal immigration authorities and, therefore, not incur the expense of putting them in jails, right, which the new law would require. i don t care about expense. i have tents. very cheap to put them in tents, if they re convicted.
Misdemeanor law in lieu of turning them over to i.c.e. but right now, we ll keep turning them over to i.c.e. we will do our duties, doing our enforcement. if we come across an illegal alien, we re going to do what we ve been doing for four years, enforcing the human smuggling laws. we ve been doing it. 40,000 people we have arrested, detained, investigated and are in our jails. i would like to see this law go through but we re still going to do what we ve been doing. why would you prefer to hold them in your jail as opposed to turning them over to federal immigration authorities? under current law you can turn the illegals over to federal immigration authorities and, therefore, not incur the expense of putting them in jails, right, which the new law would require? i don t care about expense. i have tents, very cheap to put them in tents if they re convicted. when we stop someone and there s a violation of the law, regardless of if there s a criminal violation, they re here