did you observe that. he did not yell at mr sanderson, no. he i did you observe that. he did not yell at mr sanderson, no. he is| yell at mr sanderson, no. he is auoin to yell at mr sanderson, no. he is going to testify yell at mr sanderson, no. he is going to testify on yell at mr sanderson, no. he is going to testify on monday. i yell at mr sanderson, no. he is l going to testify on monday. from your interactions with mr christiansen, is that consistent with his personality, to be aggressive like that. ob ection, your honour, i aggressive like that. ob ection, your honour, because i aggressive like that. objection, your honour, because into i aggressive like that. objection, i your honour, because into character evidence your honour, because into character evidence. ., . :. your honour, because into character evidence- how your honour, because into character evidence. how many i your honour, because into character. evidence. how many times evidence. sustained. how many tim
just comment on that. was that a cover up. just comment on that. was that a cover-u -. :, : :, , just comment on that. was that a cover-u. :, : :, , :, just comment on that. was that a cover-u. :, , :, :, cover-up. no, certainly not to. relevance- cover-up. no, certainly not to. relevance. sustained. - was eric christiansen your legal representative on the mountain. objection, relevance. representative on the mountain. objection, relevance. overruled on that. no, objection, relevance. overruled on that. no. he objection, relevance. overruled on that. no, he was objection, relevance. overruled on that. no, he was not. objection, relevance. overruled on that. no, he was not. did - objection, relevance. overruled on that. no, he was not. did you i objection, relevance. overruled on that. no, he was not. did you sticki that. no, he was not. did you stick around for that. no, he was not. did you stick around for a that. no, he was not. did you stick around for a while after t
the yes. so you wouldn t possibly know, for instance, where sanderson was coming from. ila. know, for instance, where sanderson was coming from- was coming from. no, he was behind me. i m was coming from. no, he was behind me- i m trying was coming from. no, he was behind me- i m trying to was coming from. no, he was behind me. i m trying to satisfy was coming from. no, he was behind me. i m trying to satisfy the - was coming from. no, he was behind me. i m trying to satisfy the prior - me. i m trying to satisfy the prior objection- me. i m trying to satisfy the prior objection- is me. i m trying to satisfy the prior objection. is leading. me. i m trying to satisfy the prior objection. is leading. sustained. | does the animation fairly represent your story? it does the animation fairly represent our sto ? :, , does the animation fairly represent your story?- one does the animation fairly represent your story?- one thing - does the animation fairly represent| your story?-
there is an early comment about a hit and run, did you there is an early comment about a hitand run, did you hit there is an early comment about a hit and run, did you hit and there is an early comment about a hitand run, did you hitand run? absolutely not. find hit and run, did you hit and run? absolutely not. hit and run, did you hit and run? absolutely not. and deer valley was dismissed, they absolutely not. and deer valley was dismissed, they were absolutely not. and deer valley was dismissed, they were the absolutely not. and deer valley was dismissed, they were the prior i absolutely not. and deer valley was dismissed, they were the prior party and were dismissed. do you recall that. :, : and were dismissed. do you recall that there and were dismissed. do you recall that.- there is and were dismissed. do you recall that.- there is an - that. correct. there is an allegation that. correct. there is an allegation that that. correct. there is an allegation that eric