train nam show going on in the commercial. we need a moment with you two. we left on a word that i introduced to the conversation which is this language of polarizing. i introduced in the conversation is often used. i promise i ll introduce my new guest in a moment. i would like to hear from the two of you. this insight for you, neera, you say it s wrong to think about hillary clinton as polarizing. i think what s fascinating about this is her numbers today, her negative-positive numbers, she has higher favorabilities and lower negatives than every republican candidate running today. we don t just roll out that jeb bush is polarizing even thoer she has higher positives. a great new york times piece this week people just say pollations are polarizing. the fact is she s less
empty in 2034. what it means is then the program will revert to a pay-as-you-go and only be able to pay benefits to the level of taxes that it collects. that means a 25%, roughly, cut to benefits. and who is going to be hurting the most is poor people. the cumulative gap between promises and tax rates over 75 years is over $10 trillion which, even for washington, is big. if you extend it to infinity is over $25 trillion. there is a problem the imbalance means the program is going to have to be reformed. okay. so i get that that is one side of it. i do want to point out that others really do see these numbers differently. neera, you wanted to jump? first i d like to clarify that hillary did talk about a shared set of responsibilities
advocate. that s how she s reframing herself, wife, mom, children s advocate. the average guy is not husband/dad. usually husband/dad show up later in the twitter bio. there is one interesting reframing i ve noticed. in 2008 the discourse was hillary for president. makes sense. this time apparently it will be hillary for america. and i wonder about that slightest reframing, still kind of the commonality. you know me i m hillary, i m your girl. i m your friend. instead of being about for me for president, this time it is about for you, for america. what s interesting about all this and neera and soledad alluded to it, this has been a 25-year conversation we ve had with hillary clinton as relates to her being on the public stage. the question becomes, what hillary clinton do we know? what hillary clinton do we have a relationship with?
enforcement units to investigate offenses and recuse the victims. joining the table now is malika czar who helped to craft it and tea ortiz, a trafficking survivor and victim act cat. still with us neera tanden and robert traynham. we ve heard so much about this bill but nothing about it right? right. tell me why it s important. first and foremost this is a child trafficking bill. we have at least 100,000 american children who are bought and sold for sex every day in this country. the majority of them are girls between the ages of 12 to 14 and they are girls of color disproportionate disproportionately. what plays out is that when our girls are bought and sold for sex, there is a culture of impunity for purchasing girls. those individuals, those
family, officer slager was fired and charged with murder. the justice department and state authorities on working on the case. yesterday an overflow crowd of mourners gathered at a south carolina church to pay their final respects at walter scott s funeral. now, as we await the outcome of the investigation and the movement to end police violence adds another name to the list of the fallen. the discrepancies between the police narrative and the video of scott s death open up this question, not only about the value of black lives but also about how we are to value the police account of how those lives ended. joining me is khalil mohammed director of the shom brook center for research. neera tanden and msnbc contributor robert traynham. khalil, this officer lied, not