Whats happening, he knows what roger knows about him, how much negotiation is there going to go on right now with sentencing coming, the type of prison, whether its allenwood, lewisberg, something much less pleasant, where they dont have a tennis court, where theres white collar criminals or sleaze balls, how much negotiation is the president capable of right now . In terms of where roger stone is sentenced, if hes sentenced to prison, thats not up to anyone other than the bureau of prisons. Didnt barr get involved with Manafo Manafort . The bureau of prisons does report to the attorney general. But in almost every case ive heard of, its a designation based on risk and how much time
is to be served. A second point, i also think roger stone has rendered himself absolutely useless. He has lied almost every time hes opened his mouth. It would be very hard for prosecutors to turn to him now to get Additional Information that they could use against others. Roger stone is useless. Hes a conv
What s Wrong with the Brooks and Biden Crime Bills (H R 3131 ,S 1488,8 1607)
heritage.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from heritage.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
weiss comes in and says, look, i am not the decisionmaker here. it doesn t support that at all. it supports this one fairly narrow aspect of the story. look, the main thing with shappley, what we are seeing, and, obviously, there is new information presented in this testimony that has changed narrative of the story, right. we are now talking about the d.c. and california charging decisions. we hadn t been talking about that before. let s just affirm that he has placed that into the record. but a lot of these other characterizations have not been challenged. we are not seeing him cross-examined by minority counsel on his testimony and he has yet to say that he will appear under oath before the committee as merrick garland has. so the suggestions, the question here is, there are two sets of questions here, right. what s the fact set which is what we are attempting to determine and what are the suggestions that shappley is making and what s the gaps
we hadn t been talking about that before. let s just affirm that he has placed that into the record. but a lot of these other characterizations have not been challenged. we are not seeing him cross-examined by minority counsel on his testimony and he has yet to say that he will appear under oath before the committee as merrick garland has. so the suggestions, the question here is, there are two sets of questions here, right? what s the fact set which is what we are attempting to determine, and what are the suggestions that shapley is making and what are the gaps between those two accounts? the person who could clear this up more than anyone else, it seems to me, is attorney weiss. do you agree with that, and secondly, do you expect he will soon speak? i do. i think weiss, from our reporting, weiss is particularly frustrated with shapley s characterization of himself as a whistleblower.
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.