Was always the ideal partner, was always the best response. So as presented at that particular time. If there are options out there that are better that we have a responsibility to explore them. Maybe one approach to have in the rfp to have flexibility to look at both to have as much information as we can. I dont know if you are open to that but that would be my thinking. Okay. Its really up to your direction. I know when we had the meeting with the advocates there were some that wanted that flexibility. Since it wasnt clear is why i brought it up. I just want to make sure how you want to approach that. I dont think i think its possibility to do it. It may draw a cost because we talk about what would be the option if there were no shell, but thats certainly doable. Supervisor john avalos the option being flexible to have one that includes shell and one that doesnt . Right. Along the line of what the commissioners have been saying. Supervisor john avalos okay. I think thats the right ap
Direction on. If you do not want a consultant to assume the shell contract exist and to think of other things. That is not in this rfp. It assumes the program is designed and voted on and then it assumes the local build out and asks for a creative and imaginative praj program with specificity. Im available for questions. Supervisor john avalos thank you, commissioner breed. Supervisor london breed thank you, miss miller for putting this together so quickly. I do of course want there to be a little bit more time for input and im sure you got feedback that there are some other organizations that want to take the time to review it and provide input. I would like to make sure that we have the time to do that before we finalize the rfp and i wanted to get a sense of how my colleagues as well as how members of the public feel about how we move forward with shell. Because there have been some challenges and i dont feel that they have been the best Community Partner in this Community Effort an
Mandated to be secure about this. Lafco can really push the envelope in developing an rfp that will face the compliment crisis and we need to you keep this inhouse. Supervisor john avalos thank you. Hello commissioners. Chad hose skin. We didnt hear too much about the cleanpowersf program. I was at the january 14th puc hearing and i strongly urge you to checkout the power enterprise budget information presented. A memo was available which i believe was the 1415 two year planning cycle and indicated i think in one sentence that no work would be done on cleanpowersf by power enterprise. The focus seems to be on new high revenue customers and not on engagement. Definitely a lot of information in those documents in terms of what the puc is thinking Going Forward and i dont think it do have dove tails what the lafco board is expecting. Inhouse scheduling is a comment that someone made earlier is something we heard the puc staff say they can do. And as mr. Freed indicated that could actually
Should ask sfpuc to clarify whats going on with that. As far as the whole thing, i think the key here is that even if the sfpuc gets considerably more involved and starts doing it own work on build out and cleanpowersf and gets back in the game. I think back where we let them take the ball back. This is the moment where we need to lafco stay the drive of this. This is politics. The key with the sfpuc is that as an Enterprise Agency that is in charge of rate payers and keeping the system secure, they are mandated to be secure about this. Lafco can really push the envelope in developing an rfp that will face the compliment crisis and we need to you keep this inhouse. Supervisor john avalos thank you. Hello commissioners. Chad hose skin. We didnt hear too much about the cleanpowersf program. I was at the january 14th puc hearing and i strongly urge you to checkout the power enterprise budget information presented. A memo was available which i believe was the 1415 two year planning cycle a
Comments. Colleagues, any questions or proposals . Seeing none. Public comment. For sf green. Especially for agenda items if you are going to have a meeting with the puc. The budget issues were raised earlier today. I know a big problem that was part of the budget. Its now 20 million more per year. Its good to find out how we got stuck with a new inter connected agreement that is going to be that much more money. I dont i think it due to be approved in 15. Especially that brings up another item besides cleanpowersf for their 10year projected budget, the sfpuc has agreed to remove 30 million when we have been trying to get it up to 5 million a year. We need to find out whats going on with the pg e interconnected agreement and find out why, when weve seen evidence that Minnesota Solar is beating fossil fuel or price, in usa austria this is benefit for these departments and not liabilities. It doesnt make sense when we are in a budget crunch to be cutting things. We need to find out from