us. laura, good to see. fox has confirmed that douglas campbell spent four hours behind closed doors answering questions from staffers as well as the house government oversight and intelligence committees, and he said in private that moscow paid millions to that u.s. lobbying firm to try and influence then-secretary of state hillary clinton even though she has insisted she was hands-off in this deal. this was a major deal during the years that allowed a russian nuclear energy to gain a controlling stake in uranium one, canadian-based company with mining interests in the u.s., sweetheart deal that led some russian officials to tell this informant that the fix was in. behold newspapers saying that after it was hired by the russians to influence the obama administration, hillary clinton in particular, and they spent millions doing it. a lawyer for the fbi informant told fox that the russians lay the groundwork for this deal after former president bill clinton and a wealthy canadian ph
us. laura, good to see. fox has confirmed that douglas campbell spent four hours behind closed doors answering questions from staffers as well as the house government oversight and intelligence committees, and he said in private that moscow paid millions to that u.s. lobbying firm to try and influence then-secretary of state hillary clinton even though she has insisted she was hands-off in this deal. this was a major deal during the years that allowed a russian nuclear energy to gain a controlling stake in uranium one, canadian-based company with mining interests in the u.s., sweetheart deal that led some russian officials to tell this informant that the fix was in. behold newspapers saying that after it was hired by the russians to influence the obama administration, hillary clinton in particular, and they spent millions doing it. a lawyer for the fbi informant told fox that the russians lay the groundwork for this deal after former president bill clinton and a wealthy canadian ph
so when my husband agreed to expose the contributions to his foundation, that was a very unprecedented event, which he was happy to do. but the clinton global initiative, which is separate from the foundation, has always disclosed the contribution. nina burly, this was not just a promise she made to the obama administration as a condition of employment, it was a promise she made in her senate confirmationary. well, i think that the problem with this is mainly the saudi amounts of money. they re gigantic. tens of millions of dollars from gulf countries that are had abysmal human rights records. and the money that they re taking from those countries, i think, is more problematic than the canadian mining interests.
gulf countries that are had abysmal human rights records. and the money that they re taking from those countries, i think, is more problematic than the canadian mining interests. what we re going to see is are people looking into canadian tax records and canadian documents for a very long time. you were at this speech that she gave today in new york. was there any indirect veiled reference to any of this? not a bit. but i was also at chelsea clinton s talk this morning at the council on foreign relations and she did field a few questions on it. and, of course she said that the clinton foundation s transparency is legendary, that they have stopped taking money from foreign khans and, again, she was asked about the saudi gufl money and how it interacts
economic impetus, the urgency in terms of the american economy hasn t figured more prominently in the debate over reform? i think first people should understand that the science has been around not just for a decade or two or three, but it goes back to 1840 when it was fird identified. then in 1896, a nobel prize winning chemist, swedish chemist, made the calculations that showed what would happen when the carbon dioxide doubles in the atmosphere. this goes back a long time. the controversy we re having right now is some confused people, but mainly a contrived controversy. we have to get beyond it. it keeps its role because of the power of the oil industry. and this is quite clear. it s the coke brothers, it s rupert murdoch, it s mining interests, it s exxon.