To answer the question and they continually ask this question. Is this really 100 per day per person. In fact it is actually per person that is affected. Its not an import employee. So if that employee has children, their assumption is also 36,500 per char old grandchild as well. No one will give them an answer from the irs on what that penalty is and how it stacks up. All the big it is a stall from that and we have to get clarification because there are businesses that are out there that do have a problem whether for religious reasons were other reasons. If they miss one, that is a pretty big hit. It is no longer just a fee or a penalty, but that is punitive. 36,500 per person. What i can say from the perspective of my planning is that that is not in my current work plan to address that issue. So that does not necessarily answer your question, and if that is the case, i will take you back. Any guess on a time limit . They have asked for months of clarification. Can we get a time we mi
Congress as they come together in the business of establishing righteous laws. We pray, lord, that your kingdom come, that you your will be done, as this place as it is in heaven. Only by your holy spirit can there be real unity. Real reconciliation, Real Solutions to the present issues that come through this house. Lord, your kingdom is righteousness, peace and joy. May your righteousness prevail. May your peace cover each member of the congress. Give them wisdom. May your joy be heard throughout the land. And may you bless the United States of america. N jesus name, amen. The speaker the chair has examined the journal of the last days proceedings and announces to the house his approval thereof. Pursuant to clause 1 of rule 1 the journal stands approved. The pledge of allegiance today will be led by the gentleman from michigan, mr. Kildee. Mr. Kildee i pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisi
Freedom and no structure has been put in place to comply. Or is it that there is simplicity by looking the other way rather than just on structural things . I would be interested to hear the panels view on as. Thank you very much. Lets start with that. Okay. I do think the kuwaiti government is aware that this is going on. They may not know the extent of it and i dont know how deeply. But they certainly know that its going on. And i can say that with near certainty. So i will give you an example of one of the ways that it has been difficult for kuwait to do anything about it. One complication is that a lot of the people involved are part of this in one particular individual that you actually mentioned is a former parliamentarian. On twitter he said lets get people to the streets. And that sort of person when you are dealing with those is particularly difficult. And theres one example that i thought was very telling, given a great story of two different fundraising events that were held
The will of the people. It never was the will of the people. Its a product of hook and crook and legislative shenanigan, its done against the will of the people. Furthermore, Thomas Jefferson, whom both parties revere, once said large initiatives should not be advanced on slender majorities. Large initiatives need to be bipartisan initiatives not completely 100 partisan initiatives which obamacare is. And the slender majority that Thomas Jefferson was talking about was the slender majority that he previewed or presumed to be a bipartisan majority. If jefferson had been talking about a partisan majority, it would have been clear in my opinion what he would have said. He would have said large initiatives should never be advanced on partisan majorities. Thats what happened with obamacare. The Largest Initiative that has been jammed down the throats of the American People in its entire history is obamacare, advanced on a purely partisan majority by utilization of legislative shenanigan and
Definition of employee but equally important is the issue of which and how many employees are it should be to to the business. The answer may be simple for one business with a single owner however when an individual shares ownership of multiple entities or when a business has multiple owners the answer is less clear. Today we will examine the process of determining whether businesses are considered single or multiple entities under the Health Care Law, which requires Business Owners to aggregate employees and could subject the business to the obamacare employer mandate. According to the National Federation of independent business, 39 of Small Businesses with 20 or more employees on at least 10 of one or more other businesses. To determine if the threshold of 50 or more employees has been met with the situations the Health Care Law utilizes the Internal Revenue service code, controlled Group Business aggregation rules which are complex and confusing even for most experts. Some experts h