people into work. but on the other side, there are an increasing number of tory mps and cabinet ministers who feel it is just the wrong thing to do during a cost of living crisis, to tell people on benefits that they are going to get a real terms cut in the money they get from the state. so, that issue is going to run and run and run, because the government hasn t made its mind up, and then within the last hour liz truss has opened another can of worms by saying, actually, in the long term, she still likes the idea of bringing tax down for the higher earners, just 24 hours after she had junked the policy that would have done exactly that. a month into her premiership, ben, it feels like there is a lot of debate, and some would say a lot of chaos around government positions. ilick would say a lot of chaos around government positions. nick eardley, thank ou government positions. nick eardley, thank you very government positions. nick eardley, thank you very much, government positions
terms of economic policy from boris johnson, theresa may, even david cameron, johnson, theresa may, even david cameron, to johnson, theresa may, even david cameron, to what liz truss and her chancellor cameron, to what liz truss and her chancellor are trying to do. i think the jury chancellor are trying to do. i think the jury is chancellor are trying to do. i think the jury is still out on whether or not it the jury is still out on whether or not it is the jury is still out on whether or not it is going to come off. the market seem not it is going to come off. the market seem to not it is going to come off. tt5 market seem to have made their mind up, though. seeing this headline, it does make you wonder what level of trust they are going to have in what is to come if indeed we ain t seen nothing yet. the is to come if indeed we ain t seen nothing yet- nothing yet. the only thing that seems to be nothing yet. the only thing that seems to be going nothing yet. the onl
it s mark harper, a conservative mp and former chief whip, and quite a big critic now of borisjohnson. we have to add that to yourjob description now, don t we? yeah, well, look, it doesn t particularly give me any. pleasure to do so. i d much rather be supporting the prime minister and the government. but as i ve set out very- clearly before, i think over the whole revelations . about breaking the law, not being straight about it, i and frankly asking, you know, decent men and women on my side of the house to defend the indefensible, i ve made it very clear i think - he needs to go. i think the public s made its mind up. and at some point, mps listen to the public. - otherwise, the public. deal with mps that don t listen to them. ijust wonder, mark, if the public definitely has made its mind up, because here is a prime minister who, when he became prime minister, was perhaps better known as a character than any other prime minister taking the job in our collective lifetimes. and pe
white house about the fact that there are going to be large demonstrations on january 6th in washington? i don t remember. prior to january 6th, representative greene, did anyone ever mention to you the possibility that there might be violence in washington on january 6th, 2021? i don t remember. well, i mean, michael, amber walker in court counted up to 50 times greene said she wouldn t remember. judge supposed to make a recommendation to secretary of state this week, so what do you expect? you know, i really don t think you re going to see much. i think he s probably going, already made his mind up, sounded that way through some of the questions he asked after closing argument. the one thing she did remember doing was speckifically sendinga tweet her lawyer asked to send out, didn t remember anything else and any fair-minded person,
us things about people. the big criticism of us things about people. the big criticism of this us things about people. the big criticism of this technology - us things about people. the big criticism of this technology is i criticism of this technology is around consent. so after i get my dna test that i can go on to gedmatch and i can upload my raw dna files did websites. but here is the problem with that. i share dna with my relatives, critics argue that once i uploaded my dna and agreed to law enforcement checks, i am by association also opting in my entire extended family. and using my dna, the police cancelling hundreds, even thousands of my genetic relatives to a crime, potentially none whom have consented to be on a database used by the police. t consented to be on a database used by the police. used by the police. i think the thing about used by the police. i think the thing about people used by the police. i think the thing about people have - used by the police. i thi