conditions underwhi which it wa written. try to think of what the founders would think today. they in writing the second amendment, so much of it was in virginia, where james madison lived. what they were looking to do is to protect the state militias made up of citizen soldiers who were required to own a military weapon and that was their mark against tyranny. they wouldn t have imagined that people in a misguided way would have taken what they did centuries later and say it permits this demented and tragic act. the second amendment and the way we understood guns which is unique, we have always had gun laws but had gun laws and a sense of spoblt, too. it is only a recent thing that having strong gun laws some people thought trampled on a sacred individual right. that s not the full history of
the video. all this proves to me is that 1996 when they made the nevada network, it was pressent and sadly understated. your book spends a lot of time at the second amendment and the social political conditions you understand which it was written. what would try to think about what the founders would have made of today? well, they really, in writing the second amendment, so much of it was in virginia. where james madison lived. what they were looking to do above all else was to protect those state militias which were made of citizen soldiers who were required to own a military weapon and there was their bulwark against tyranny. they could not imagine that people would take what they did centuries later and say somehow it protects this kind of demented and tragic activity. throughout the country s
there s a video being posted by the video. all this proves to me is that 1996 when they made the nevada network, it was pressent and sadly understated. your book spends a lot of time at the second amendment and the social political conditions you understand which it was written. what would try to think about what the founders would have made of today? well, they really, in writing the second amendment, so much of it was in virginia. where james madison lived. what they were looking to do above all else was to protect those state militias which were made of citizen soldiers who were required to own a military weapon and there was their bulwark against tyranny. they could not imagine that people would take what they did centuries later and say somehow it protects this kind of demented and tragic activity. throughout the country s
it. deadlines are self imposed. the ultimate victory will be a nuclear free military weapon. there s no reason to not to take more time. the alternative to not having an agreement is iran double downs and gets a nuclear capability and the only way to stop them is through war. that s not good for the united states. that s not good for israel or iran. if we re at all close we need to continue to the finish line and protect the planet. i understand the argument you re making.
the president said all options are on the table. we re testing right now the negotiation whether we can do that. it would be more effective in preventing iran from getting a military weapon than a military strike as long as the deal we re envisioning. there are costs that come with mill tarlry action. it s not enough to oppose the negotiations. frankly, if the alternative is military action that comes with costs and consequences. turning to isis right now. iraqi forces backed by militia, backed by the republican guard, troops with them in iraq are they winning this some of the these wars against isis right now around tikrit, the battle snzs? we have seen isil push back around baghdad and in the area around tikrit just as we pushed isil back in the north around the kurdish areas where we have