basically saying is for department of defense people in europe also and this includes contractors, civilian employees and command sponsors, dependents, family me believes, as well. now prohibiting unofficial travel to paris including a 50-kilometer radius around the city and want to read the end of this press release. that is precautionary measure to keep the personnel and families safe in light of the recent attacks. this is also an effort to minimize tourist traffic at the board earls in france and in particular paris as french authorities continue the investigation. so we re already seeing the reverberations of this attack. the military of the united states restricting their personnel to bases in europe. seems expected. also, understandably at this time. while things remain so fluid as you point out, a reverberation. so many different things being felt here. thank you very much. keep me posted on the updates. joining me now is contributor
if you recall, chuck, it was unanimous that we should close guantana guantanamo. president bush, senator mccain and senator obama. so then the real question is, to what extent is it still in our interest to do that and that the conduct of the war is advanced by doing it? i think it s the core of his powers as commander in chief and he should use them the country will get over it. this is not a real security threat. i m confident that the military of the united states will be able to replicate the facilities that are in guantanamo and keep the nation safe from these detainees. so do you believe he s probably going to test this constitutional authority that you believe he has? well, from day one, i think he s always wanted to do it with congress. from day one, he s tried to work with congress and for some reason, i think it s the nimby issue, that congress has made it more and more difficult.
strikes. those are the forces fighting against president asaad who is russia s ally. while the u.s. and russia disagree who was targeted, they agree they need to talk to avoid unintended incidents. the first instruction to us was to make sure that the military of the united states, the coalition led by the united states on the one hand and the military of the russian federation now engaged in things at the request of the syrian government get in touch and establish channels of communication to avoid any unintended incidents. it is one thing, obviously, to be targeting isil. we re concerned if that s not what s happening. u.s. officials say the russians gave them very little notice of the impedding air strikes in syria, and that the
the reaction is and whether or not they were to come to some points of agreement and unison in the face of this crisis. good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, we met with secretary kerry for i think the third time in few days. today we devoted our meeting to the fall-out of what our presidents agreed when they met here on the 28th of september. the first instruction to us was to make sure that the military of the united states, the coalition led by the united states on the one hand and the military of the russian federation were now engaged in operations in syria at the request of the syrian government. get in touch and establish channels of communications to avoid any unintended incidents. we agreed that the military should get into contact with each other very soon. number two, we also discussed
on the heels of the two leaders meeting. it creates an issue, kimberly of how is the u.s. military going to engage with the iraqis, they can t share intelligence if they believe that the iraqis are sharing it with the iranians. in terms of military forces, is the bombing enough, if they had been bombing isis, in combination with u.s. efforts, turkish efforts works that take out isil? or is it inevitable that someone going to have to send ground troops in there? airstrikes are of limited value when it comes to fighting an army of terrorists, like isis has become. so no airstrikes alone, the russian airstrikes alone will not make a big difference. even if they were engaged in the fight against isis. but the bottom line is, they re not. it s all a lie. it s a figure leaf so they can bolster the bashar al assad regime. that s what the pentagon is