aggression against ukraine, this will entail severe consequences that we agreed will entail severe consequences that we agreed upon together, severe sanctions we agreed upon together, severe sanctions that we have worked on together~ sanctions that we have worked on together. so there will be a high price together. so there will be a high price for together. so there will be a high price for russia. this is a very clear price for russia. this is a very clear message. everybody has understood it and i think this message understood it and i think this message has been made clear again and again message has been made clear again and again so that even russia has understood the message now. what is important understood the message now. what is important is understood the message now. what is important is that we also intensively work on preparing possible intensively work on preparing possible sanctions together. we don t possible sanctions together. we don t want to s
like to put in that place, and. but that s the theory. i know that s the theory of the deal signed back in 2019. but you cannot believe that s the reality, can you? well, it can, it can happen if there is a proper kind of consultation, and under the pressure from the street, if the military would like really, you know, to remain, i mean, as partners and remain in power, there is no doubt that they have to find a way to agree with the people. otherwise, there d be no stability in sudan, and it s going to be a lose lose situation. well, there is no stability in sudan. that s quite plain. i mean, more instability. itjust seems to me it s quite easy for you to sit there in washington, albeit no longer actually with all the trappings of the embassy, but you sit there in washington saying, oh, well, if the military
too militaryize response. the entire focus was how can we make sure we don t move too fast and the military don t do too much. how can we be as careful as possible. congratulations, they did not react. the military was too lower case c conservatives. senior officials made the fatal error of under estimating the danger of this mob. betsy woodruff swan, thank you so much. there was a concern again and again about optics from some of these generals. the optics are bad, it went out the window when police officers were beaten with american flags and people charging into the capitol. they did not hesitate six months earlier to have the national
for the radicalism that has swept the republican party. and i sadly coming to the point where i have to admit. there is always underlying stran strans of racism in that court. the more we try to explain the radicalization of the party. i am not sure historians will talk about this demographic change. we all know it has been coming for 30 years. we all know who s going to change american politics but i am not so sure. americans won t look at the eight years of barack obama and say that was a triggering point for white americans who were either racially incentive orray
is what a real editorial page saying omnivore omz. oh my god. how in the world are they allowing this to be printed? it s a free marketplace of ideas when you have 45 to 48% of americans who supported a presidential candidate throughout, you know, threw out his run and his presidency. fred was not afraid to give voice to opinion shapers that represented that 48% when so many won t. the new york times fired the editorial fired. their editor for something he