Weight: 160 lbs.
Marks/Scars/Tattoos: scar on l arm (burn marks, no change 10/6/2015); scar on l calf (deep scar, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on r arm (pic of robot, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on r arm (eyeballs/ dopey with face, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on chest (maltise cross, no change 10/6/2015); mark on (none reported,no change 10/6/2015); piercing on ear (both ears, no change 10/6/2015); prosthesis on (none reported, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on neck (rope, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on head (tribal, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on l arm (spiders, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on r arm (spiders, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on back (moon, no change 10/6/2015); tattoo on back (wiltz, no change 10/6/2015); other on (10/6/2015 offender reports no other)
there that fall into this. one is have you ever been convicted of a felony? if you check no, atf basically uses this form, 4473, to do that criminal background check and a lot of times those records will not match up. in other words, you won t get a military conviction on an ncic printout to do the background check that atf does. there s also another question on there that goes to mental stability. have you ever committed to a state facility? and if you answer no to that question it really is sort of on the honor system because of hip pa laws atf has no way to check the veracity of that question if you answer yes or no. how do you prevent people from slipping through the cracks? that s a good question. really the only way, when you purchase a firearm and you use this form 4473, basically all it s doing is checking your criminal history to 345make sur
what do we know about the correlation? yeah, so we know this about workplace violence in general, which is very akin to what we re dealing with here. the number one reason, the root cause of most workplace violence is domestic situations that spill over into the workplace and, clearly, that s what has happened with this church shooting. i have to tell you, while we re all spending time analyzing the subtle nuances of the law, whether his military conviction for domestic violence applies to the law, and whether he was court-martialed through a general court-martial or special court-martial but not a summary court-martial and whether it qualified as a misdemeanor or felony, here s what we do know. we gave a man who was convicted of domestic violence against his wife and kids, and spent a year in confinement in a military brig, we gave him an assault rifle and security guard license to guard a water park around children. we need to know about what we do
investigation has to be motive. no, it absolutely is moss ti but they re all, the atf, texas rangers, sheriff, they re looking for motive, facts, eviden evidence, forensics. they re trying to see if he was a prohibited person, stephanie, as you ve been discussing with ali. was he prohibited by his military conviction? a bad conduct discharge does not prohibit you from having a gun but a conviction for domestic violence does and a felony conviction does. so those military records have to be looked at. did they disqualify him in it sounds like they do. did the air force osi, you know, and their criminal investigators and their courts ent they re into the nix system so when he went back to buy the gun, the back ground is flagged? he s a prohibited person if that s the case. but, you know, unfortunately now we can put our fingers on three cases where our internal
to to you? there s been this sense for all these years somehow our legal system isn t up to the job after 225 years. terrorism has been arnds for a long time. the attack on the benghazi consulate is a terrible crime. our system can try it and punish it. since september 11th, there have been 500 people convicted of terror related offenses and they are serving sentences. in guantanamo, eight convicts, six by pleas and two after military conviction. they were overturned on appeal. guantanamo and the military commission has been a disaster legally, politically and morally. the idea that we can t do a trial, we can t get information from defendants is simply wrong. there s no support for it. guantanamo is a symbol of political football.