saying he would like to withdraw all two thousand u.s. troops who are in syria that was against the advice of his military advisers who are wary of another situation like afghanistan or iraq who want to stay there and make sure that the islamic state cannot get another foothold in the region before backing out but this directly contradicts what he was saying earlier this month and so it s unclear from his words alone and from what the white house is saying what kind of action we re going to see. you were mentioning there that goes dialing back the rhetoric how might russia though respond to any possible american military action. well brian russian law make us a warrant already of the united states is that moscow would concede and asked dr take on syria as a war crime that could trigger a direct military clash between the two form a call to walk countries i think sikandar a senior russian lawmaker for example set russia would engage its washington in the
way the united states would compile. on one hand it s a welcome development and moves us back from impending military clash. the focus is on diplomacy and getting to negotiations. so forth korea has been saying for years they are not going to give up the treasured nuclear weapons and changed the constitution in 2013 to inshien themselves as a nuclear state. they want to get back to square one of the failed negotiations. if they keep the requirements that the u.s. do all the removal of troops, et cetera, that s a none starter. you tweeted out something, the unexpected north korean offer of a summit is like waking up to a baby on the doorstep. maybe an ugly one but you have to bring it inside. i have to be careful on my tweets. i also said it was like a korean
daca recipients brought to the country as children. it s a similar plan president trump introduced in the past few weeks. a community in mourning after two police officers are killed responding to a 911 call, and now we re learning this is not the first time authorities went to the home where they were gunned down. also, tensions flaring a day after a military clash between two middle east superpowers. we go to jerusalem for the latest on the showdown between israel and iran as questions loom about what the u.s. response could be. the one message that became very clear was israel, i think said about as perfectly as they can, if you try to get into our territory, we re going to hit and you we re going to hit you hard.
daca recipients brought to the country as children. it s a similar plan president trump introduced in the past few weeks. a community in mourning after two police officers are killed responding to a 911 call, and now we re learning this is not the first time authorities went to the home where they were gunned down. also, tensions flaring a day after a military clash between two middle east superpowers. we go to jerusalem for the latest on the showdown between israel and iran as questions loom about what the u.s. response could be. the one message that became very clear was israel, i think said about as perfectly as they can, if you try to get into our territory, we re going to hit and you we re going to hit you hard. (female vo) breaking news from washington as lawmakers; (male vo) raging wildfires continue to scorch parts; (male vo) allegations of misconduct; oh, why you look so sad, the tears are in your eyes,
so mikhail gorbachev is still alive. he was a visionary. he had a different vision. nato is a military alliance. nato is not a tea party. what was nato s purpose at the end of the first cold war? its purpose became expanding to russia s borders. but step aside. we are in an exceedingly dangerous moment, the syrian air strikes which don t seem to have any real coherence. the president has not stated any coherent outcome. has led dmitry medvedev the pro western leader in russia to say that we re on the verge of a military clash. i think we need some sobriety. because what you see with trump is incoherence, chaos, crudity, contradiction. and i think it s incumbent upon particularly progressives to lay out a common sense security foreign policy that is not an