what they think about. they give him guidance and give him room to meraneuver f they r okay, he s okay. there s a huge social gap between those oligarchs and the rest of the population of russia. you have the poor, the very poor and the out of touch. that means informationally out of touch. i don t think this message gets to them and is an effective message. it s the right mets, and you have message, and you have to applaud the president for saying it emphatically. what the president is doing is information warfare, and it needs to be done. this is a continuum of warfare, cyber is an element of military application of force. it shapes the battlefield, the russians are doing it, and we re trying to do it for positive results. so evelyn, nato received a request from ukraine today. it s interesting, after so much time of the united states talking about an imminent invasion, and ukraine down playing it. ukraine came out and did
biomedical research. we are assuming these not pharmaceutical apps. probably not developing new leukemia drugs. we would assume, because you all but said it, that there is a military application to this research. are they working on by weapons? again, it s not a particularly clever method, the rhetorical questions, so you re not making a claim. it s obvious. that s the whole point, right? tucker carlson and fox news ceo suzanne scott both know that ukrainian labs are not making biological weapons. they must be working for whatever agenda they have, as media critic tucker really comes out as pro putin, instead he s anti-anti-putin-ism. mainly democratic party, which oppose the war by extension, tucker works to legitimize a lot of the kremlin s favorite topping points. it s not an exaggeration, just to be clear. people can say whatever they want. but this is what s happening. it s when he s doing. the kremlin itself seized
the secret ukrainian bio labs? ukraine is the poorest country in europe and hardly a hotbed of biomedical research. we are assuming these weren t pharmaceutical labs, probably not developing new leukemia drugs. from your answer you would assume, because you all but said it, that there s a military application to this research. again, your answer suggests that. why would we from something like that in ukraine? and why didn t you secure the contents of these bio labs before the russians arrived as you knew they would. and why did you go out of your way to lie to the american public about all of this? if the research materials in these labs were to escape somehow, and you seem very concerned about that, what would be the effect on ukraine and the rest of the world? how can we prepare for the consequences of that, this thing you are worried about? shouldn t we be preparing? rita spent the last two years living with a pathogen that began in another form bio lab
supplies, ammunition, weaponry, drones, javelins, stinger missiles and the like i know you talked about earlier in the hour, we ve got to leverage incredible american logistics capability. i mean, think of amazon, think of walmart, think of the commercial and the military application. we ve got to help our partners push advice in there so we can ensure we win this race. as poor as the logistic performance has been of the russians, we can t let them get their act together. we ve got to continue to push supplies into kyiv, particularly in light of the fact they may be trying to execute some kind of encircling maneuver and trying to lay siege to the city of kyiv. brigadier general steven anderson, thank you so much. we have been getting so many great viewer questions about ukraine. send me yours. i m going to try to pose them to