the supreme court, it has set up real implications as it set out up to what don trump was trying to do on january 6th. so we already know that clarence thomas s wife, julie, was corresponding with mark meadows about the election and also corresponding with one of trump s lawyers, john eastman, that man there, after the election. now eastman is kind of in the thomas circle. he was the author the regional memo and he was also a former thomas clerk. december 4th, 2020, cheney asked eastman if he would proves it a status update to a group of great upstate leaders, presumably an update on eastman and other possible unindicted coconspirators efforts to have donald trump steal the election. we also know that john eastman spoke about his theory to overturn the 2020 results with a lawyer for vice president mike pence, mike jacob. in that conversation john eastman talked about he thought it would play out it s a
clarence thomas s wife, julie, was corresponding with mark meadows about the election and also corresponding with one of trump s lawyers, john eastman, that man there, after the election. now eastman is kind of in the thomas circle. he was the author the regional memo and he was also a former thomas clerk. december 4th, 2020, cheney asked eastman if he would proves it a status update to a group of great upstate leaders, presumably an update on eastman and other possible unindicted coconspirators efforts to have donald trump steal the election. we also know that john eastman spoke about his theory to overturn the 2020 results with a lawyer for vice president mike pence, mike jacob. in that conversation john eastman talked about he thought it would play out it s a dispute of election needed all the way up to the supreme court. this comes from jacob s testimony, to the january six committee, last year.
mr. jacob, you discussed and even debated this theory at length with dr. eastman. dr. eastman ever tell you what he thought the u.s. supreme court would do if it had to decide this issue? yes. we had an extended discussion, an hour and a half to two hours on january 5th, and when i pressed him on the point i said john, if the vice president did what you are asking him to do, we would lose nine to nothing in the supreme court, wouldn t we? initially he said well, maybe you will earn only 72. and after some further discussion, acknowledged, well, yeah, you re right, we would lose 9 to 1. nine nothing or 7 to 2. i think i can come up with what those two would be. who were two justices who would be willing to transgressed the law so thoroughly that they would endorse a coup?
Requiring container ship operators to file an export policy would be too costly — and unlawful as well, carriers tell regulators. The post Ocean carriers warn FMC against regulating prices appeared first on FreightWaves.