momentarily as soon as we get it here. i ve asked michael isikoff and abigail to stick around. we re joined by samuel buehl, and barry burk, the cochairman of the he litigation department at cramer/levin. abigail, i know you have reported on this the very tenuous situation between the president and john kelly. no surprise here. you ve heard about they heightened tensions, even reaching a point where there s so little of a working relationship left. so i think this is a long time coming, especially when we look at the reports that have come out over last we re, this timing isn t all that surprising. i think everybody expected this
with regard to collusion. as you said before, when you overturn another stone, you have to go down that path. the simple question to that is, no, it s not over yet. pete, thank you, as always. mike isikoff and abigail tracy, with a welcome to you both. i want the biggest takeaway, michael, you first. clearly the assertion by the southern district that michael cohen committed two felonies at the direction of the president has got to be the headline there, but i agree with pete. there are real questions about where to take this from that point. david pecker is the third witness to this. he was the publishers of the national enquirer. i think he can corroborate that
testimonies to roberts mueller, which could lead to potential other questions of perjury, but there definitely is an appetite among democrats in the house. obviously however in the senate we re in the same situation, of course, but i would like to note that the senate intelligence committee has operated in a much more fashion to date. thank you all for weighing in. kellie o donnell, michael isikoff, abigail, barry burk and all of you. we had sam nunberg and cross over into his position. so we ll come back with you right after the break, and get your take on all of this. stay with us, everybody. introducing fidelity stock and bond index funds
a separate criminal investigation. against who? about what? we don t know. it s all redacted. common sense tells you the truth. he s got something else working. there will be more to come. on that basis, you see a lot of suggestive language in the two documents that it s a little bit of a beware. we asked people for help. not everybody wanted to come up. we learned a lot of things anyway. they should be held to a high standard and this could be the first of a number of iterations of moves by the special counsel. let s look at what s here and let s look at what they got from flynn and let s look at where it leads. we have two perfect guests. we have d.c. and former u.s. solicitor general neal catyal and chief investigative correspondent and co-authorize of russian roulette, mike isikoff. haven t gotten anything wrong yet in terms of laying it out.
matters as rosenstein said, that arise from his investigation, but he may choose to send those to u.s. attorneys offices like the eastern district of virginia, the southern district of new york, that have independent jurisdiction, and obviously there are a whole host of reasons that we discussed for doing that. it protects those investigations from meddling. well, betsy, you and i have heard about this mike isikoff piece moving. what weight do you give it, that this thing is coming to a head? he s a fantastic reporter. he broke the whole lewinsky thing. if he breaks it, you re on ground taking it seriously. all indications are this is correct. the fact we ve already talked about which is we have a cohen sentencing memo coming up this week, a manafort sen tenning memo. the flynn sentencing memo. the flynn memo has the potential, we don t know, has the potential to be telling. the part is flynn has been working with mueller s team for