differing parties so the president wouldn t have to make the call. he thought that she should let things be had outed from the president. objectively as possible, accurate information,cu representing all viewpoints or you can decide. when you present inaccurate information as he did in the case of what he told the vice president, whether he was intentionally lying or not, it s almost beside the point. you have fallen down on the job. he probably needs to be with a more neutral temperament than mike flynn had. he enjoys wide respect but that does not mean he is the right man for this job. tucker: that s right, he b may have been temperamentally unsuited for it. whatever you think of flynn specifically, that the agencies can undo someone using data gathered in surveillance, that is got up at the fear of god
it does not mean that flynn is a great guy. it would give us more information than just us going back and forth. tucker: that s the one part of our conversation that is not speculation. if this person is potentially compromised, they might be blackmailed, at the same timeon there should be a full investigation about what occurred. tucker: congressman, thanks a lot. general flynn s downfall has already hindered trump s overtures towards russia. it could be very difficult to build a friendly relationship with the regime in that country for more, we go to fox news correspondent trace gallagher. hey,rr teresa. tucker, the administration is now acknowledging president trump has known for a weeks that form a national security advisor michael flynn misled the white house about his contacts with russia. but there is nothing illegal h about flames conversations with the russian ambassador to the w u.s. concerning u.s. sanctions but democratic lawmakers andnd
differing parties so the president should make the call. he thought that she should let things be had outed from the president. objectively as possible, accurate information, representing all viewpoints or you can decide. when you present in accurate information as he did in the case of what he told the vice president, whether he was intentionally lying or not, it s almost beside the point. you have fallen down on the job. he probably needs to be with a more neutral temperament than mike flynn had. he enjoys wide respect but that does not mean he is the right man for this job. tucker: that s right, he may have been temperamentally unsuited for it. whatever you think of flynn specifically, that the agencies can undo someone using data gathered in surveillance, that is got up at the fear of god
who warned the trumpsi administration, there is potential leaking and blackmailing situations like someone who is general flynn tucker: i just want you to say unequivocally you should not break the law by spying on u.s. citizens and then leaking illegally the contents of those conversations to the washington post. if we cannot agree that s the bad thing, what s the basis of our conversation? just agree that that is out of bounds. it should be. any citizen has privacyis rights that we should respect. general flynn may have crossed the line. at the same time, i am willing to investigate and actually look at this at the full scope of what occurred there. if hise violations dash that should also be remedied to. at the same time, tucker: that s not a debate point, we know that is a factual matter. the law was violated. let s just say that.
into everybody serving the executive branch. what probably looks like what happened here, they pick up his conversation of the u.s. ambassador. they now are in possession with classified information with very sensitive information on two counts. having it get out might compromise sources and methods and the second is they have information that they probably not should not have or should be very careful with about the private conversations of united states citizen. that information is doubly disturbing of the kind of protections that intelligence agencies are just providing and it leaked out. that may be a crime. the question becomes, was mike flynn sinned against more than